Thursday, December 30, 2010

Black Butte XXI

Deschutes Brewery
Imperial Porter
11.0% ABV
22 oz., best after 10/17/10 poured into a big snifter on 12/30/2010. Described as a, "Porter brewed with chocolate beans and coffee added with 20% aged in bourbon barrels." and, "Imperial version of Black Butte." Aged on cocoa nibs from Dominican Republic and Ethiopian coffee; uses 3 types of chocolate malt and three varieties of  NorthWest hops.

Appearance 4.5/5
Clear and dark brown with a creamy dark tan head that dissipates fast in a wide mouthed glass, but stays longer in a nonic pint. Likewise for lacing, average in a snifter, kickass in a nonic.

Aroma 4.5/5
Creamy and sweet smelling from English/Scottish style malts. Caramel-toffee is very prominent, then chocolate, and some oak-bourbon. The latter gets dominating at warmer temperature. Rich and complex. And good.

Taste 4.5/5
Flavorfully bittersweet, a quintessential porter with the added complexity of barrel aging. It has everything: chocolate, coffee, dark caramel, roast, slight sweetness, and more. The acidity of coffee is quite noticeable but the flavor, not so much. Chocolate notes are strong, and the roast is powerful as well in the aftertaste, preceded by a medium-sweet finish.

Mouthfeel 3/5
Mouthfeel is a big big letdown. Thin and disappointing, this beer doesn't seem any stronger than Black Butte and that is a fault in my opinion. The carbonation is alright, and the finish is commensurate with the alcohol and richness, but honestly, my homebrewed robust porter has a better mouthfeel.

Drinkability 3.5/5
Drinkability is good in the sense that you can slam it, but that's never a good quality for a high ABV beer. Come on girl, make your ABV felt!

Snowstorm 2010

Snowstorm 2010
August Schell Brewing Co.
Weizenbock
7% ABV
12 oz. bottle with a best by date of 03/21/11 poured into a Sam Adams perfect pint on 16/12/10.

Appearance 3.5/5
Dark caramel-garnet hued, with a clear but syrupy look to it, this ale poured with a tan colored creamy head that was smaller and more controllable than I expected. The head was quick to subside into a thin sheet of tiny bubbles but left sticky lacing all over the glass as it fell from its glory. Even though I agitated the bottle at the end, the beer seems quite clear, and the head disappeared way too early. Odd.

Aroma 3/5
Faint notes of clove over syrupy sweetness (meant in a *good* way), and relatively strong notes of banana and... spice?! For one the smell was weak but the esters quickly yielded to spice and a strange cigarette ash like smell. Odd, again.

Taste 3/5
Taste is largely nondescript. Slightly sweet and then tannic-bitter with estery notes after the sweet finish that are reminiscent of the great beers from Europe; but memories don't cut it, they torture. Too bitter, and yet the finish is bock-y. Also, too much abv in this one.

Mouthfeel 2/5
Mouthfeel got too watery as the beer warmed. I am going with 2/5

Drinkability 4/5
Drinkability is ok, except for high-ish ABV.

Founders Bastards

Dirty Bastard

Founders Brewing Co.
Strong Scotch Ale (also called "wee heavy")
8.5% ABV
50 IBUs
12 oz. bottle with illegible bottling date poured into a New Belgium snifter on 16/12/2010. Judging by how aggressive this particular beer was, and because it's one of Founders flagship beers, I would guess that it wasn't too old.

Appearance 3/5
Molten copper and rusty hued with a medium tan head. Medium retention and lacing, and lots of disgusting chunks!

Aroma 4/5
A very delicious aroma comprising of caramel, toast, perfumy alcohol, dessert. Much like Scotch whisky, with bready beerness to it.

Taste 4/5
Flavorful and aromatic with the same notes that were present in the aroma, but a tad too bitter and astringent from roasted barley/malts, I am assuming. Fairly roasty and cleansing finish but some sweetness manages to linger. Fruity flavors in the after breath that are akin to Scotch. Quite astringent towards the end, but without the wood.
The dirty chunks in Dirty Bastard.

Mouthfeel 3/5
Low carbonation, which is proper; the body is thinner than what I'd like. A stronger body and sweetness are terribly needed in my opinion.

Drinkability 3.5/5
Not bad, but the malt complexity wavers, faced with strong, one-dimensional roastiness.

Backwoods Bastard

10.2% ABV
This beer is the bourbon barrel aged version of Dirty Bastard. 12 oz. bottled 11/16/09 poured into a 3 Philosophers glass on 12/20/2010.

Appearance 4/5
Deep with the gravity of molten lava, and yet so clear. Viscous and mighty looking with a murky, bubbly head that left excellent lacing as it receded. This one also has lots of floaties, but not as disgusting as Dirty Bastard.

Aroma 4/5
Sweet like bourbon, but lots of Scotch like notes, caramel, toffee, perfume. Complex, but weak.

Taste 4.5/5
Hard to say if mixing Scotch and Bourbon is always a good idea, but I think it works for this ale. There are distinct smoky notes of Islay whisky. Slightly sweet with roast and smoke in finish with a distant, but present, Single Malt purity. Finishes a little astringent (welcome) but still very smooth, and sweet. Alcohol is softly present. Some dry fruit notes as well. A fine, complex, and subtle beer but doesn't achieve greatness, in my opinion.

Mouthfeel 4/5
The body is thinner than what I would have preferred, but alright given the base beer. Carbonation is low and fitting.

Drinkability 4/5
Good. The impression of Scotch whisky is very well done.

Sierra Nevada Grand Cru

30th Anniversary - Grand Cru
Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.
American Strong Ale
9.2% ABV
Poured into a wine glass about 2 months after the release. The label says that it's 33% oak-aged ale and the rest is simply ale: From their website, it's a, "marriage of our three most acclaimed ales: Oak-aged Bigfoot, Celebration Ale, fresh Pale Ale blended together and generously dry-hopped." I would guess it's an equal blend of the 3 beers.

    First off, the cork was tight to the extent of being severely irritating. I couldn't pop it open and resorted to a corkscrew. Well, the corkscrew broke when I tried to pop the cork out (the dark green piece in the bottom right corner of the picture came out). The cork broke twice but didn't come off until it was in three pieces, and when it came off, it came off with one of the loudest pops and white fumes. Finally!

    The ale poured in a deep, glowing amber colored stream and made a huge light murky colored head. The head retention was so good that I had to wait for a few minutes to smell and taste the beer, and when the head subsided, it left thick and beautiful lacing all over the glass.

    The first whiff was disappointing. I could find adjectives if I tried too hard and made stuff out of the air but this beer smelled pretty much like, um... beer? Yeah, there wasn't anything characteristic to it. After the glass got a little emptier, I could pick some hops, toffee and oak notes riding on a bready character. Complex but not impressive in its strength.

    Perhaps it's palate fatigue or just plain boredom but I haven't been able to really enjoy D/IPAs for the past few weeks. They all seem less. So I am glad I picked this one tonight! Starts lightly fruity, much like Celebration but finishes deliciously tannic and hugely bitter. The aroma was a let down but in taste it meets, if not exceeds, the likes of Oaked Arrogant Bastard. Hops and oak rule this ale with an unyielding bitterness and the just right tannic astringency. It's like drinking a tea brewed with hops, only the body is much stronger.

    Finishes relatively clean for it's body, and I am sure the intense hoppiness and oak contribute towards that. Still, the sweetness lingers behind the long and bitter aftertaste. The carbonation is fittingly low, although it could've been the warm serving temperature. Great on drinkability, this one is guaranteed to warm you up, and bitterly so.

Scores: Appearance 5/5, Aroma 3/5, Taste 4.5/5, Mouthfeel 5/5, Drinkability 5/5.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Shakespeare Oatmeal Stout

Shakespeare Oatmeal Stout
Rogue Ales
Oatmeal Stout
6.1% ABV (BeerAdvocate)
69 IBUs
OG 15° Plato
22 oz. bomber with no freshness date poured into a Lion Stout mug on 12/29/2010

Appearance 4.5/5
Clear and dark brown with a big dark mocha head. Good head retention and kickass lacing! Very very inviting.

Aroma 3.5/5
Soft chocolate notes, some sweet malts and perhaps some coffee like sharpness. Weak.

Taste 4.5/5
Mildly sweet, grainy, and coffee like at the beginning, yielding quickly into a strongly bitter, roasty, acidic and astringent finish. A very nice stout experience. Some hop flavor as well in the intensely roasty-bitter-coffee aftertaste. It's better than what sometimes gets passed off as "Imperial", and yet is way lower in alcohol.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
Medium body and medium carbonation. More harsh than silky, not that I mind!

Drinkability 5/5
Great drinkability, lots of flavor and low ABV. What else do you want?

Hop Stoopid

Hop Stoopid
Lagunitas Brewing Company
Double IPA
8% ABV
102 IBUs
OG 1.085
22 oz. bottled on 320th day of the year (mid November) poured into a snifter on 12/20/2010.

Appearance 4.5/5
Deep amber colored and brilliantly clear to the extent of seeming artificial for a DIPA; big and long lasting white head and good lacing.

Aroma 4/5
Pine and tropical fruit that play well with the sweetness. Smells like a balanced DIPA. Some spicy hop character too, or is it the garlic?

Taste 4/5
A good malt backbone that manifests itself in some sweetness too and melds well with the fruity hoppiness and esters. Finishes strongly and one dimensionally bitter and the bitterness lingers. Some warmth is noted.

Mouthfeel 5/5
Decently carbonated, medium bodied, and well attenuated. Perfect.

Drinkability 4.5/5
One of the best DIPAs I have had and that too at a great price; but not as good as I thought before reviewing. Also, I have had it alongside Pliny the Elder and Pliny the Elder deserves to be the legend it is.

Surly Abrasive

Abrasive Ale (also called 16 Grit)
Surly Brewing Co.
Double IPA
8.8% ABV
~120 IBUs
OG 19.5° Plato
Color 8° SRM
16 oz. canned on 12/20/2010 poured into a snifter on 12/21/2010. That's correct, 1 day old!

Appearance 4/5
Poured straw golden colored in a brilliantly glowing stream and looked amber-orange in the glass. Very clear but not crystal clear, perhaps because of being dry hopped and unfiltered. Good bone white head that dissipated fast and left little lacing. Odd.

Aroma 4/5
Very very fruity: mostly tropical fruit notes of mango, papaya, and then some pear, apricot. Smells similar to the same brewer's Wet. No alcohol burn or alcohol aroma at its ABV! Some onion-garlic notes that are not my favorite. An intense hoppiness but not the kind I like best, personally (pine, citrus... I wish)

Taste 4/5
Very fruity and a little sweet, light on palate but big on the bitterness at the end and in the aftertaste. Some citrus is noted in the aftertaste but overall the hop flavor is mostly of sweeter fruit. However, I am having second thoughts with at times overwhelming onion-garlic taste.

Mouthfeel 5/5
Well carbonated, but more smooth than crisp with a decent malt backbone and still clean finish.

Drinkability 4/5
An extremely easy drinking beer, but for the ABV. Mostly soft and pleasant on the senses, although I like my IPAs mean. Overly fruity for my tastes but what's worse are the discordant onion-garlic notes. That said, it's a straight up DIPA. A very good beer and highly recommended if fruity IPAs are your thing.

The Abyss or: Another reason to go to Goodwill


    I have been "watching" the very fast evolving U.S. beer scene for about an year and a half now, sometimes actively, but not as much as many others, and I have seen my fair share of beer releases and associated hype in and around Twin Cities, MN. In that interval I have been able to buy, or drink on tap, pretty much every limited/hyped beer that I have been interested in that has made it to the tap or shelves, and acquired some that have not. Examples include Black Note (184/0), Bourbon Barrel Aged Plead The Fifth (95/7), Black Biscuit (92/4), Canadian Breakfast Stout (618/7)... The numbers in the brackets are Wants/Gots with Wants in Red and Gots in Green. Point being, to a large extent, I am on top of it as far as the cities are concerned.

    There was a recent thread on Beeradvocate titled, "Are you getting sick of the "scarcity" of limited releases?" Although I never posted on that thread, my answer leans more towards YES. I understand that most of the problem is with consumers like myself who take shit from (some) breweries but man, are they full of shit! And (some of) the distributors, and even (some of) the store managers. Goose Island's Bourbon County Brand Coffee Stout was a huge hit in the earlier part of this year and quickly made it to #3 on Beeradvocate then top 100 (Pliny the Younger is #3 as of now). Maybe that success got to their heads or maybe I am just bitching but here's what I have seen: Bourbon County Brand Stout 2009 was so well distributed that it is still sitting on shelves at some places and they have chosen to NOT distribute the 2010 version to MN, or WI, it seems; Bourbon County Brand Vanilla Stout didn't make it to shelves in many stores and you had to ask for it at the counter, if you were lucky enough to find a store that had any left of the one case (12 bottles) they received; and they released a Rare Bourbon County Brand Stout for $45/22 oz. bottle. Before anyone argues that it took that many dollars to produce, read this and take cues. Some madness surrounding these releases in these threads [1, 2] and there's a lot more if you care to search the forums or follow the ISO/FT's.

    Deschutes is fairly large brewery that brews the highly decorated Abyss and not so decorated but very sought out Dissident, among other beers under their Reserve Series. Deschustes started distributing to MN early this year and we have seen other beers from their Reserve Series quite a bit on shelves and I was expecting, like most, that we will get to buy these ones in decent quantities. After all the batch sizes are huge. Turns out that merely 30 cases and 2 sixtels of not so stellar Dissident made it to the entire state. The Abyss, while not so limited was also pretty fucking hard to find unless you are (were, it's almost gone) prepared to call scores of stores and drive around. Even then, there are (were) no guarantees. Also, the distributors don't tell retailers when and how much they are going get, and some retailers have been douchebags about it too.

    Heritage Liquor (fantastic beer store, A+ on Beeradvocate) is my go to store and Ed, the boss, had posted that Dissident would be very very tough while Abyss would be more manageable. I needed (wanted, but I am a part of the problem too) both of them for some trading commitments so I made it to Heritage's annual Beer Geek Christmas, when the said beers were due for release. We made there early in the morning because no one was answering the phone and were told to come back later, in the evening when they would release the beers. So, we went back in the evening: Unbelievable as it is, every decent store has more than 12 regulars so no one could be guaranteed a bottle, and so, Heritage had to raffle the buying rights away! That's right, you had to win a lottery to be able to buy a 22 oz. bottle priced around $13.00, excluding the 10% tax. And me and my buddies were out of luck. Result? Calling all the stores we could with no success, and much indignation, justified or not.

    So I kept on following the forums and someone posted that Princeton's in Maple Grove had a few bottles of The Abyss the last evening. I had to drag my good friend and have him drive me under tough driving conditions (snow) to Princeton's (after trying two more stores) that's almost 25 miles away. Since the tires of the car we had were not very good, we had to exit the highway to clean the snow off them as well! After all this peril, we were able to score 1 bottle of The Abyss and 0 bottles of The Dissident. One of the co-owners, Bill, also seemed irritated at the madness surrounding the recent limited releases, and seemed to be of the opinion that it is an ugly side effect of an otherwise good thing (craft beer growth). Feeling bummed, we left the store with the one bottle of The Abyss that I planned on sending to my trading buddy in Chicago, and hoping to get some for myself on tap.

Link to the map if you don't believe my claims about the distance :P

    Anyway, because my friend had to drop off some clothes at Goodwill, we drove back to our neck of the woods and decided to stop at Big Top at Midway, St. Paul that's very close to Goodwill (locations D, E in the map above). It's a good beer store but not in the same league as Heritage or Princeton's, mostly because of the staff/curse of chain store, I guess. So I ask the guy if they had any Abyss and he said they just got their case in and it'll be $12.99, and, "How much do you want?" Expecting a limit, I asked if I could get 3, and he asked whether the both of us wanted 3! I don't know whether I didn't want to hoard or couldn't justify spending, or both, but I settled for 3 (my buddy was not interested). At this point I had given up every hope for The Dissident but I asked anyway, and bingo! The entire case that they had just got in was up for sale! I might have bought more than the 2 I actually bought, had I not had it on tap and found it disappointing. So happily we walked out, and drove to Goodwill where it got even better: I found 2 nice medium sized (~10 oz.) snifters for a dollar each, a sturdy ass Chimay chalice for $2, and a nice and tall weizen glass for another $2. Between more than 50 miles of driving in bad ass snow that took way longer than the Google Maps estimate of a little over an hour, and ups and downs of finding and not finding what we headed out for, it was a morning well spent! :)


    Although I haven't sent my package to my trading buddy, 2xAbyss and 1xDissident are going to him and the rest is going into my pseudo cellar. I was also able to get Bourbon County Vanilla because of the said trading buddy, without having to drive around, and passed Rare Bourbon County because I fail to see the value. The same week I found The Abyss on tap on Stub & Herb's and this is what I thought of it:

The Abyss
Deschutes Brewery
American Imperial Stout
11.0% ABV
65 IBUs
10 oz. of 2010 Reserve on tap on 12/16/2010, served in a wide mouthed chalice like glass. Described by Deschutes as, "Stout brewed with licorice and and molasses with 33% aged in oak and oak bourbon barrels," and, "It's dark. It's deep. It's mysterious. This imperial stout has immeasurable depth inviting you to explore and discover its rich complex profile. The flavor of this special brew draws you in further and further with each sip. The Abyss beckons. Enjoy the journey."

Appearance 5/5
Poured pitch black with a tiny muddy hued bubbly head that dissipated soon into a thin collar and a mocha like thin sheet of foam on the surface, leaving some lacing behind. Couple of swirls coaxed a darker and bigger head, and some legs. Looks the part.

Aroma 4/5
Sweet chocolate and coffee notes in the smell. Roast. Bourbon. Lots of harmonious notes that were weak to begin with but got stronger as the beer warmed up and the glass got emptier. Quite complex aroma but closer to a Russian Imperial Stout in my opinion because the roast and coffee seem strongest and barrel character is subdued compared to other barrel aged American Imperial Stouts. Still, the oak-vanilla notes come forward later and meld well towards a unified goodness.

Taste 4.5/5
Perhaps it was the cold serving temperature, or the fact that the style itself is very wide, or perhaps it's not as good as the respect it commands, but the first sip was thin and underwhelming. But things got better with temperature bringing forward a bourbon like sweetness, bright coffee like acidity that could be lacto derived, and a superb finish that's massive on roast, medium-dry, with a very long aftertaste that is full of dark chocolate.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
Again strongly dependent on temperature, the beer felt thin and overcarbonated at first but got rich and silky later.

Drinkability 4.5/5
A very good tasting and smooth drinking beer that matches well to its alcohol content too. Not my favorite interpretation of the style but a very well done brew.

The Abyss I liked a lot but The Dissident not so much when I had it on tap. I will be aging my bottle until its best after date of 11/2011 to see if there's any improvement.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Couple of reviews - II (Town Hall edition)

I was out drinking with bunch of friends on the night of 12/06/2010 at the Minneapolis Town Hall brewery and ended up reviewing a few excellent beers. Here are my thoughts:
________________________________________________________________________
West Bank Pub Ale (on cask)
4.8% ABV
Served in a shaker pint glass at the brewpub. Described by the brewery as:
British style pale ale featuring the the rich character of UK Golden Promise malt with a distinct finish from the use of British Fuggles and Golding hops.
I think it was an American Pale Ale, and not an English style pale ale. I won't even bother reviewing it as an English ale because it would qualify as a horrible horrible example!

Appearance 4.5/5
Amber orange hued with slight haze that's perhaps because of cask conditioning, this beer came with a dense, creamy and persistent off white head that left excellent lacing over the course of the pint.

Aroma 4.5/5
Intense, intense hop aroma of American citrus hops, which is why it cannot be an English style bitter. Very good aroma, even if it's one-dimensional.

Taste 4/5
Great bitterness and hop flavor riding on a rather thin body. One-dimensional again, but enjoyable nonetheless.

Mouthfeel 4/5
Thin, which is not necessarily a fault in an ale at this ABV. Carbonation is lower than I would like but it could be the temperature and the fact that it's on cask.

Drinkability 4.5/5
Good. A very nice low ABV option. Always welcome.
________________________________________________________________________
Broken Paddle ESB
ESB
4.6% ABV
Served in a shaker pint glass at the brewpub.

Appearance 4/5
Deep copper, with a white head that is small but consistent. Decent lacing.

Aroma 2/5
Smell is simply put, odd and un-beerly. No caramel, toffee, or fruit that I'd expect from an ESB. WTF?! Thankfully, it's not repulsive!

Taste 3.5/5
Not half bad when compared to the smell. Decently bitter with an alright backbone but bland in general without any malty and fruity flavors that I would expect from the style.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
Spot on, with mute carboantion.

Drinkability 4/5
I didn't enjoy the taste all that much but mouthfeel and ABV keep it decently drinkable. A sessionable beer, if nothing exceptional.
________________________________________________________________________
Masala Mama IPA (on cask)
American IPA
6% ABV
Served in a shaker pint glass at the brewpub. Here's my review of the regular version.

Appearance 4.5/5
Deep copper hued, slightly hazy with a creamy and persistent head with good lacing.

Aroma 5/5
Most intense citrus, herbs, flowers, and pine. Dank, flawless, excellent.

Taste 4.5/5
Silky, smooth, and bitter.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
The crispness is lost on cask and that's a minus in my book when it comes to IPAs.

Drinkability 4/5
I enjoy the regular version more; does that make me a bad person? ;)

Couple of reviews - I

I like to do my reviews with pretty (I like to think) pictures and it doesn't appeal to me to make an entire post with just one review and no beerpr0n to go with it. So here are a few picture-less reviews that have been lying in notes in my jacket, notebook, office and apartment!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samuel Adams Chocolate Bock
Boston Beer Company
Bock
5.6% ABV
OG?
IBUs?
12 oz bottle with a best by date of April 2011, poured into a pint glass on 12/10/2010.

Appearance 4/5
Darkest of browns, and yet brilliantly clear, with a creamy, fluffy, light brown head. Medium retention and unexpectedly poor lacing.

Aroma 3/5
Lots of chocolate, some seemingly metallic notes and none of the bock character.

Taste 3/5
Plenty of chocolate notes on a light malty sweet base. Clean flavors that come with a well done lager, although the label says this is an ale. None of the bock character in taste either. A light, clean, 2% chocolate milk like beer.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
Medium carbonation, medium body, and silky mouthfeel.

Drinability 4.5/5
Good. Quite flavorful and under 6% ABV! But the name is deceptive for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cygnus X-1
Flat Earth Brewing Company
Porter
6.5% ABV
45 IBUs
OG 1.065
25 SRM
On tap at Stub & Herb's served in a shaker pint glass.

Appearance 3/5
Very dark brown and clear with garnet highlights and a medium head that dissipated into a thin collar rather quick and left some lacing.

Aroma 4/5
Mostly roast, lots of coffee, some very mute sweetness along with rye breadiness as the beer warmed up. Very nice overall.

Taste 4/5
Plenty of roast and coffee, slight sweetness, some acidity and a roasty finish.

Mouthfeel 4/5
Seemed thin and overcarbonated at times, but good in general.

Drinability 4/5
Good, but alcohol could drop a few points for a simple beer like this one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frambozen
New Belgium Brewing
Raspberry Brown Ale
6.5% ABV
15.5 IBUs
OG 1.016
12 oz bottle with a best by date of 02/20/2011 poured into a Saison Dupont glass on 12/16/2010.

Appearance 5/5
Brilliantly clear, deep ruby brown with a light pink colored fluffy and persistent head that left excellent lacing.

Aroma 3.5/5
Mostly raspberries in the nose and they too are not strong enough: neither in terms of sweetness, nor flavor. Some lightly sweet milky notes that I am not sure I liked.

Taste 2/5
Light sweetness and some flavor of raspberries but nothing remotely resembling "wow". Finishes clean with some tannic notes and some hoppiness. I hated it.

Mouthfeel and Drinkability are ok (3/5 on both). This beer is full of mediocrity in my opinion.

Monday, December 20, 2010

Obsidian Stout (nitro-tap)

Obsidian Stout
Deschutes Brewery
American Stout
6.4% ABV
OG?
55 IBUs
On nitro-tap at Pracna on the Main, as part of their Deschutes December event.

Pours usual dark colored but with poor head, poor head retention and some lacing. The aroma and taste were roast, malts, chocolate, coffee and had some coconut notes, something that I never got from this beer. In my opinion "nitro" hurt this beer's mouthfeel; can't say how or why but seemed thinner than usual and there was no creaminess that I was expecting. Drinkability is good. Review from bottle here.

Scores:
Appearance 3.5/5
Aroma 4/5
Taste 4/5
Mouthfeel 3.5/5
Drinkability 4/5

Sunday, December 19, 2010

Lindemans Framboise

Lindemans Framboise
Brouwverij Lindemans
Lambic - fruit
2.5 - 4% ABV
IBUs?
OG?
12 oz bottle poured into a Lindemans glass.

Appearance 4/5
Deep, dark, saturated pink with a lighter pink head. Medium retention and good lacing

Aroma 4/5
Strong raspberry and sugary sweet smell, and that's about it. Not anything complex but good nonetheless.

Taste 4/5
Very similar to the smell, the taste is dominated by strongly sweet and medium tart raspberry, with some tannic feel that's perhaps from barrels? Finishes quite clean for a beer this sweet.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
Medium body with good carbonation, crisp feel and dry finish. Quite refreshing.

Drinkability 3.5/5
The sweetness is a little over the top but good otherwise.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

St Bernardus Abt 12

St Bernardus Abt 12
Brouwverij St. Bernardus
Described on the label as a Dubbel; classified as  a Quadrupel on Beeradvocate
10.5% ABV
IBUs?
OG?
750 ml bottle poured into a big snifter, in stages of course, at little below room temperature. The beer was allowed to warm up in the bottle and in the glass over the course of the review.

Appearance 5/5
Deep garnet colored, moderately clear, with a big murky brown head; excellent head retention and fantastic lacing.

Aroma 3.5/5
Yeasty to the extent that other aromatics get pushed to the background. There is a good amount of toasty-bready malt character, fruit and esters, and malty and alcoholic sweetness but all of these are unfortunately dominated by the strong yeasty smell.

Taste 3.5/5
Aromatic sweet, with all the character from the smell coming in, and some hop bitterness and the tiniest bit of tannins towards the end. The taste is not bad and certainly above average, but it is dominated by what I assume was strong yeastiness.

Mouthfeel 5/5
Medium body and medium carbonation: feels right.

Drinkability & Other 4/5
A good beer for sure but the strong presence of a character that's not to my liking surely affects my ratings. Stylistically I don't see the need for this strong yeast flavor. It's hard for me to appreciate why this beer commands the respect it commands or how is it, what some people say, "practically same" as Westvleteren 12. I have had the top rated Quadrupels/BSDAs side by side in a tasting that included this beer and I failed to see its charm then, and  I fail to see it now. In my opinion it's not close to Westvletern 12 in character and nowhere close to Westvleteren 12 or Rochefort 10 in merit.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Dortmunder Gold

Dortmunder Gold
Great Lakes Brewing Company
Dortmunder Export
5.8% ABV
30 IBUs
OG 14˚ Plato
12 oz bottle with a best by date of 01/17/11 poured into a Sam Adams perfect pint on 12/09/2010.

Appearance 4.5/5
Golden colored, brilliantly clear, with a medium sized off white head. Good head retention and lacing.

Aroma 4/5
Light euro hop aroma that gets enhanced as the beer warms up. Some pils like character that doesn't get dominating because of sweetness in smell. Some sulfur. Dead on, but a little weak.

Taste 4/5
Taste is equally good, and to style: good balance of hoppy-crisp-flavorful pils like character and sweet, slightly heavier malt character. Finish is initially crisp and slightly bittering but immediately gets dominated by relatively strong sweetness. Perhaps all Dortmunder lagers are supposed to be like that but I'd have preferred dry crispness myself.

Mouthfeel 4.5/5
Medium body and good carbonation. Very well done in this department

Drinkability 4/5
Great, easy drinking beer. Only if there was a way of cramming all this flavor into a lower alcohol beer.

The Dissident

The Dissident
Deschutes Brewery
Oud Bruin
10.5% ABV
30 IBUs
OG ?
On tap at Pracna on the Main, as part of their Deschutes December event. Served in a Deschutes snifter. I could try this beer only because of the generosity of the manager Meagen (chixdighops) and her boyfriend, and some luck. Thanks guys for letting me have the last drink of the sixtel!

Appearance 4/5
Brilliantly clear, deep rusty red hued with a tiny collar and some lacing.

Aroma 3.5/5
Funky and fruity, typical sour brown but nothing too exciting. Some sweet alcohol too.

Taste 3.5/5
Lightly tart and fruity with an unfitting bitterness/astringency towards the end.

Mouthfeel 4/5
Smooth and light bodied with medium carbonation.

Drinkability 4/5
Good.

Other
I don't get the hype. Hugely underwhelming. I will not part with anything that I can't get off the shelves for this beer.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Dark Horse Bourbon Barrel Aged Plead The 5th

Bourbon Barrel aged Plead The 5th
Dark Horse Brewing Company
Bourbon Barrel aged Russian Imperial Stout
Limited release, mostly for events. Details like ABV missing.
Reviewed from a small sample, poured on tap, at Heritage Liquor's annual Beer Geek Christmas.

Pours pitch black with a dark brown bubbly collar. Tough to comment on retention and lacing but looks like a classic barrel aged stout. Excellent aroma, full of vanilla and chocolate notes with plenty of sweetness, but no harsh alcohol. Bourbon is certainly present, and dominates the aroma but only in good ways.

Taste is similar to aroma with bourbon shining, bringing a great oak-vanilla element to taste and enhancing the chocolate. Bittersweet with coffee like acidity that was absent in the nose, and seems a little over the top. Finishes clean and bitter. The body is a little thin for my liking and carbonation a tad higher. If this is actually 14% ABV, it drinks amazingly easy!

One of the best examples of Bourbon Barrel aged beers in the sense that Barrel aging has made an otherwise average RIS excellent! Do not pass it up if you ever get the chance to try it!

Scores:
Appearance 5/5; Aroma 4.5/5; Taste 4/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Drinkability 4.5/5

Meantime IPA

Meantime IPA
Meantime Brewing Company
English IPA
7.5% ABV
IBUs?
OG ?
750 ml bottle with no freshness date poured into a Maredsous glass on December 08, 2010.

Appearance 3.5/5
Amber to light orange hued, with poor clarity, medium off white head, and medium head retention and lacing.

Aroma 2/5
Most faint spicy-earthy hop aroma riding on an equally faint malty sweetness and that's about it. Thoroughly unimpressive.

Taste 2.5/5
Medium malty sweetness, some spicy hop flavor, very low bitterness, and some alcohol. Could've been called average had it not been for the horrible aftertaste.

Mouthfeel 3.5/5
Not too terrible on the body with low carbonation that seems fitting.

Drinkability 2/5
I don't see the appeal of this beer except for its fancy bottle and cool label. I've never had a true English IPA (except this one!) but I am sure there exist much better representations of the style. This one was a complete waste of liver and dollar alike. One of my friends that I shared the bottle with went as far as calling it a vile beverage. While I might not have such an extreme sentiment, I am not buying this again, and perhaps avoiding it for free too, unless it smells of something remotely hoppy, in which case I would chalk my experience up to a bad/old bottle.

Houblon Chouffe Dobbelen IPA Tripel

9% ABV
IBUs?
OG 18° Plato
750 ml bottle with a best before date of June, 01, 2012 poured into a Duvel tulip on December 02, 2010.

    Prejudices can be tricky. I can’t quite explain why wasn’t I expecting much from this beer even before I opened it, while I have enjoyed “Belgian” IPA’s in past. I am quite sure I picked it up only because it’s well regarded and I am glad I did, because this beer shattered my prejudice and pleasantly surprised me.

    Slightly hazy, straw golden hued, it poured with a big, but still controllable, white head that settled into floating chunks on the surface leaving patchy lacing all over the glass. A simple aroma of Pilsner malts and what I assume were Saaz hops filled the surroundings, and had me anticipating a crisp, pilsner like ale. Verdict? Not quite, but close: begins sweet but prickly carbonation cleanses the palate and the sweetness quickly yields to a bitter-for-Belgian-ales finish, that has hints of Pilsner character. The finish is still quite sweet. That’s it. I would have finished my review had this been a 11.2 oz bottle, thinking of this beer as a double pilsner.

    However, being as this was a 750 ml bottle, there was plenty left, warming up in the bottle. Upon second pour, I picked a lot of bready sweetness, with the bright fruitiness of apricots, pears and apples, that prevented the aroma from getting monotonically sweet. There were hints of soft, alcoholic perfume in the background. A very good aroma, with all the character present in the taste too. The crispness was gone by now but I didn’t regret it, because of now apparent rich malt and ester character, akin to bigger malty beers. Medium bodied and lively on the palate with a medium, but bittering, finish with hints of soft, sweet, alcohol.

    I was so intrigued and impressed at this point that I had to crack open a Duvel only for comparison. I understand that these are two different beers but I really wanted to see how it stood against Duvel. In my opinion, Chouffe is a hoppier BSPA and it’s a fair comparison. I found that while Chouffe is more complex than Duvel, Duvel is better done, but they are equally good. I would’ve liked Chouffe even better had the bitterness seemed more in place, but that’s perhaps just nitpicking. A fantastic beer, highly recommended. I will seek a fresher bottle myself!


Appearance
4.5
Aroma
4.5
Taste
4
Mouthfeel
5
Drinkability
5

La Trappe Quadrupel

La Trappe Quadrupel
Bierbrouwerij De Koningshoeven B.V.
Quadrupel
10.0% ABV
IBUs?
OG ?
750 ml bottle poured into a 25 oz snifter. With this beer, I have reviewed at least one beer from all Trappist breweries!

Appearance 4.5/5
Clear, ruby-garnet hued with a great depth of color, this ale poured with a huge murky light brown head, with good retention and lacing, if not the best.

Aroma 3.5/5
Estery and malty, with a complex nose: notes of toast, caramel and dark fruit, along with a banana-phenol character; sadly, all of it is overpowered by alcohol, that is soft but strong, and very very distracting.

Taste 4/5
Spice (mostly clove), banana, caramel and alcohol dominate the taste, blending into a nice dark fruit character with a slightly bitter and slightly tannic, medium finish. Typical, but good. The taste differs from other Quads in its strong banana notes, and (at times) overpowering booziness.

Mouthfeel 5/5
Medium bodied, with low carbonation aiding the beer.

Drinkability 4.5/5
Too much alcohol interference, but enjoyable otherwise.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Nosferatu

Nosferatu
Great Lakes Brewing Company
Imperial Red Ale
8.0% ABV
70 IBUs
OG: 18° Plato
12 oz bottle with a best by date of 12/30/2010 poured into a 25 oz snifter on 12/01/2010 at room temperature.

Poured clear, ruby colored, with a good white head, medium head retention and lacing. Aroma was mostly hops with some complex malt notes but overall weak. I got a lot of CO2 in the aroma as well and I think I might have poured this beer a little too warm.
Flavorful bitterness from hops complemented by aromatic sweetness of dark caramel and toffee. Warming with a medium finish and a long, bitter aftertaste. The body was thinner for my preference and drinkability was alright.
For the purpose of scores, I compared this beer to Arrogant Bastard and it doesn’t come close. Frankly, I don’t see much potential in “red” ales, imperial or otherwise.

Scores:
Appearance    4/5
Aroma        3.5/5
Taste        3.5/5
Mouthfeel    4/5
Drinkability    4/5

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The pursuit of worthiness

    Anyone who has bought Stone's bottles should be familiar with their mockery of mass manufactured beer and its drinkers. And they kick the mockery up a notch with their Bastards lineup, "This is an aggressive ale. You probably won’t like it. It is quite doubtful that you have the taste or sophistication to be able to appreciate an ale of this quality and depth."
    While it is should be clear that this is good natured banter, one would expect a lot of substance in these beers, to be deserving of such strong words, even as a joke. For folks like me, one of the methods to determine the quality of a beer is to compare it against the best examples; the other method being personal liking. On the two biggest beer websites, Stone's Bastards are listed under the umbrella of "American Strong Ale." Stone claims, and rightfully so, that the very origin of this style is the Arrogant Bastard Ale, and that there's none alike, "As the progenitor of its style, Arrogant Bastard Ale has reveled in its unprecedented and uncompromising celebration of intensity. There have been many nods to Arrogant Bastard Ale…even outright attempts to copy it… but only one can ever embody the true nature of liquid Arrogance!"
    The Arrogant Bastard ale came out 13 years ago and many styles have been invented since so one would expect that American Strong Ale would be a well defined style by now and ask the question, "What are the guidelines for an American Strong Ale?" Since my primary source for all things related to beer styles BJCP doesn't have any such category, I turned to Google: click on the link or just see the results in the picture below:


    The definitions from these websites are copied here for your convenience, with the exception of Wikipedia definition that draws from these:
  • Beeradvocate "Catch all style category for beers from 7.0 percent alcohol by volume and above. Some may even be as high as 25% abv. Characteristics will greatly vary; some have similarities to Barley-wines and Old Ales. Barrel aging is certainly not out of the question."
  • ratebeer "Not a style, per se, but the only logical category to incorporate the plethora of strong, stylistically vague beers coming from American micros these days. Some are related to English Strong Ales, but with more hop, while others are ultra-strong variants on the IPA or red ale themes. But no matter how varied their origins or characters might be, all are intense, potent, with generous quantities of hops and malt."
  • Home Brewing Wiki "American Strong Ale is a catch-all term used to describe a diverse group of beers brewed by American craft brewers."
    Vague, right? I know. So I turned to Great American Beer Festival (GABF) that directed me to CraftBeer.com but there's no such style there either.
    Finally I turned to Stone's BeerU and got this:


    My conclusion: There's no such thing as a single quintessential American Strong Ale. I'll add that in my opinion, Stone's Bastards could also be called American Old/Stock Ales, if you need to call them something. Reason being that they taste a lot like aggressively hopped versions of strong, malty, beers. Much like traditional Old ales/Stock ales/Barleywines, only much much hoppier.
    In any case, they're a class apart and Stone did invent them!

    Now that it's understood (or not) what to expect, let me describe the setting of this tasting. As this page, titled The Evolution of Arrogance, would reveal, Arrogant Bastard Ale was released in 1997, Double Bastard Ale in 1998, Oaked Arrogant Bastard Ale in 2004, and to celebrate 13 years of "liquid arrogance", Stone released Lukcy 13asartd (Lucky Bastard) a few weeks ago.

Beer
ABV
Year of release
Other
Arrogant Bastard
7.2%
1997
The first American Strong Ale. A strongly hoppy ale with a big malt character too, unlike D/IPAs in which malts are lighter in character.
Oaked Arrogant Bastard
7.2%
2004
Oaked Arrogant Bastard, just like the name says.
Lukcy 13asartd
8.5%
2010
A dry hopped blend of AB, OAB, and Double Bastard.
Double Bastard
11.2%
1998
Arrogant Bastard, doubled. Literally.

    I am from MN and Stone doesn't have distribution here. However, many of their offerings are available 30 minutes away in Hudson, WI, although this won't be the case anymore since they're pulling out of WI too, but might start distributing to MN. We'll see. Anyway, Arrogant Bastard and Oaked AB are easy to find in Hudson but I had to request a friend to get me Double Bastard and Lucky from Chicago and he was kind enough to bring some even though he took the bus. Once I had all the bastards chilling in the fridge, it was time for a tasting. Keep in mind that these ales are palate wreckers, and the order in which we had them was very important! Although, we saved some to try side by side as well. Here are the notes and comments, in the order the beers were sampled:


Arrogant Bastard
You're Not Worthy
Poured into a New Belgium snifter. Rust brown colored and clear; dark tan head with good retention and lacing; massive hops in the nose with notes of pine, citrus, herb and grass. Subdued malts, with notes of caramel and brown sugar in the aroma. Medium bodied with firm bitterness and caramel notes without any sweetness. Very very bitter! More bitter than most IPAs and DIPAs, with sticky character of caramel in body but not in taste. While Stone recommends an enjoy by date, this should be enjoyed at all ages. Finishes clean and bitter. Old review here.

Oaked Arrogant Bastard
You're Still Not Worthy
Poured into a New Belgium snifter. I have had and reviewed this beer before, but when it was within the freshness date and I strongly recommend having it after that date, to let the Oak emerge from the massive shadow of hops. The one in the tasting was past its freshness date and I am glad it was. Looks like Arrogant Bastard, but with a slightly lighter hue and haziness, that is not chill haze. Hops in the aroma had muted and aroma had strong notes of Oak (wood, vanilla) along with the brown sugar and caramel character. Taste had a similar profile and was still massively bitter: I think it'll take years for the bastards to get any less bitter!

Lukcy 13asartd
A Slef Trbitue to 13 Yaers of Arorgnace
Poured into a Lucifer snifter.
Appearance 5/5
Dark ruby, rust brown colored, and slightly hazy with a big and creamy brown head with good head retention and kickass lacing.
Aroma 4.5/5
This one sure is aggressively dry hopped, to the extent that other Bastards that are no short of hops seem pale against this one. The aroma has the most intense herbal and leafy character from dry hopping. Very fresh smelling, and un-bastardly to be frank. My only complaint is the complete dominance of hops on caramel and oak.
Taste 4/5
Strangely light and fruity taste, perhaps because the palate is conditioned to hop assault by now, but most likely because of the freshness introduced by intense dry hopping combined with the dark caramel sweetness. Yes, the sweetness of malts finally shows up among the group and it's not surprising that it's coming from Double Bastard. However, oak still seems absent.
Mouthfeel 5/5
Body is certainly bigger than AB and OAB. Low carbonation, or perceived so because of higher temperature. Clean finish with a long lasting bitterness and hop flavor.
Drinkability 5/5
Very good.
Other
This is Bastard & a half if you ask me! I can't tell if I'd like to age this one because the hop character will fade, but it's a shame that oakiness is completely shadowed in this version.

Double Bastard
Ye Shall Know the Bastard, and the Bastard Shall Set You Free
Poured into a Duvel tulip.
Appearance 5/5
Dark ruby and rusty, with the clarity and depth of molten lava. Big brown head, great retention and lacing.
Aroma 4/5
Pine, citrus and caramel rule. Strangely, not as strong smelling as I thought it would be.
Taste 4/5
Strongly bittersweet. Very sweet compared to other bastards but more bitter as well. Seems like an American Barleywine except that it's much more close to AB than any other beer. Caramel notes are present but it's mostly the hop flavor that dominates. Finish is quite clean given the amount of malts in this ale.
Mouthfeel 5/5
Viscous, thick, coating and overwhelming with low carbonation. Spot on.
Drinkability 5/5
Very good, given the ABV. Can't have it too fast and can't have too much, but whatever you can have will go down damn smooth.
Other
This ale is recommended for aging and I sure as hell will if I can get another bottle.

    After we were done sampling these at least once, someone asked that how do these differ from AIPAs and DIPAs, which makes sense to ask because hops rule these beers. So we cracked open a Bell's Two Hearted. Holy shit! It tasted like a lightly sweet beverage, like a mango-banana smoothie. I kid you not, no bitterness and no hop flavor at all could be perceived. Although the IBUs on the bastards are classified, I have no doubt that they easily exceed 100. On top of that the caramel character is HUGE, like a double, if not triple, ESB, if any such thing were to exist.

Monday, November 29, 2010

90 Minute IPA

9% ABV
90 IBUs
OG?
12 oz bottled 11/02/2010 poured into a New Belgium snifter on 11/26/2010
Appearance 4.5/5
A very “deep” looking beer: so smooth and viscous that it doesn’t splash or foam much even when poured vigorously. Burnt orange hued, slightly hazy with a very creamy and very dense off white head. Good head retention and lacing, signature DIPA looks on this one.
Aroma 3.5/5
Earthy and grassy hop aroma, like green leaves in mud but meant in a good way. Very different from other D/IPAs but not strong enough. Sweet malts are present too.
Taste 3.5/5
Bitter and flavorful with hops but overly malty. Fruitiness is present but seems clashing. Some booze. Taste is better than average but nowhere close to the best. Gets cloying after a while.
Mouthfeel 4/5
Silkier and heavier bodied than most examples of the style with decent carbonation but not biting or crisp.
Drinkability 4/5
Drinkability is alright for a 9% ABV beer but it doesn’t seem like a DIPA.

Unplugged Apple Ale

4% ABV
IBUs?
OG?
12 oz. bottle from 2010 release poured into an Ommegang balloon glass on 11/25/2010.
Appearance 3.5/5
Brilliantly clear, amber-orange, with a white creamy head. Average head retention and some lacing.
Aroma 3.5/5
Weak spice and some apple.
Taste 4/5
Light, but bright, tartness and apple notes with a refreshing sweet spiciness. Medium finish with a good after-apple aftertaste.
Mouthfeel 4/5
Medium-light body and good carbonation.
Drinkability 4.5/5
Easy drinking yet flavorful.