Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The pursuit of worthiness

    Anyone who has bought Stone's bottles should be familiar with their mockery of mass manufactured beer and its drinkers. And they kick the mockery up a notch with their Bastards lineup, "This is an aggressive ale. You probably won’t like it. It is quite doubtful that you have the taste or sophistication to be able to appreciate an ale of this quality and depth."
    While it is should be clear that this is good natured banter, one would expect a lot of substance in these beers, to be deserving of such strong words, even as a joke. For folks like me, one of the methods to determine the quality of a beer is to compare it against the best examples; the other method being personal liking. On the two biggest beer websites, Stone's Bastards are listed under the umbrella of "American Strong Ale." Stone claims, and rightfully so, that the very origin of this style is the Arrogant Bastard Ale, and that there's none alike, "As the progenitor of its style, Arrogant Bastard Ale has reveled in its unprecedented and uncompromising celebration of intensity. There have been many nods to Arrogant Bastard Ale…even outright attempts to copy it… but only one can ever embody the true nature of liquid Arrogance!"
    The Arrogant Bastard ale came out 13 years ago and many styles have been invented since so one would expect that American Strong Ale would be a well defined style by now and ask the question, "What are the guidelines for an American Strong Ale?" Since my primary source for all things related to beer styles BJCP doesn't have any such category, I turned to Google: click on the link or just see the results in the picture below:


    The definitions from these websites are copied here for your convenience, with the exception of Wikipedia definition that draws from these:
  • Beeradvocate "Catch all style category for beers from 7.0 percent alcohol by volume and above. Some may even be as high as 25% abv. Characteristics will greatly vary; some have similarities to Barley-wines and Old Ales. Barrel aging is certainly not out of the question."
  • ratebeer "Not a style, per se, but the only logical category to incorporate the plethora of strong, stylistically vague beers coming from American micros these days. Some are related to English Strong Ales, but with more hop, while others are ultra-strong variants on the IPA or red ale themes. But no matter how varied their origins or characters might be, all are intense, potent, with generous quantities of hops and malt."
  • Home Brewing Wiki "American Strong Ale is a catch-all term used to describe a diverse group of beers brewed by American craft brewers."
    Vague, right? I know. So I turned to Great American Beer Festival (GABF) that directed me to CraftBeer.com but there's no such style there either.
    Finally I turned to Stone's BeerU and got this:


    My conclusion: There's no such thing as a single quintessential American Strong Ale. I'll add that in my opinion, Stone's Bastards could also be called American Old/Stock Ales, if you need to call them something. Reason being that they taste a lot like aggressively hopped versions of strong, malty, beers. Much like traditional Old ales/Stock ales/Barleywines, only much much hoppier.
    In any case, they're a class apart and Stone did invent them!

    Now that it's understood (or not) what to expect, let me describe the setting of this tasting. As this page, titled The Evolution of Arrogance, would reveal, Arrogant Bastard Ale was released in 1997, Double Bastard Ale in 1998, Oaked Arrogant Bastard Ale in 2004, and to celebrate 13 years of "liquid arrogance", Stone released Lukcy 13asartd (Lucky Bastard) a few weeks ago.

Beer
ABV
Year of release
Other
Arrogant Bastard
7.2%
1997
The first American Strong Ale. A strongly hoppy ale with a big malt character too, unlike D/IPAs in which malts are lighter in character.
Oaked Arrogant Bastard
7.2%
2004
Oaked Arrogant Bastard, just like the name says.
Lukcy 13asartd
8.5%
2010
A dry hopped blend of AB, OAB, and Double Bastard.
Double Bastard
11.2%
1998
Arrogant Bastard, doubled. Literally.

    I am from MN and Stone doesn't have distribution here. However, many of their offerings are available 30 minutes away in Hudson, WI, although this won't be the case anymore since they're pulling out of WI too, but might start distributing to MN. We'll see. Anyway, Arrogant Bastard and Oaked AB are easy to find in Hudson but I had to request a friend to get me Double Bastard and Lucky from Chicago and he was kind enough to bring some even though he took the bus. Once I had all the bastards chilling in the fridge, it was time for a tasting. Keep in mind that these ales are palate wreckers, and the order in which we had them was very important! Although, we saved some to try side by side as well. Here are the notes and comments, in the order the beers were sampled:


Arrogant Bastard
You're Not Worthy
Poured into a New Belgium snifter. Rust brown colored and clear; dark tan head with good retention and lacing; massive hops in the nose with notes of pine, citrus, herb and grass. Subdued malts, with notes of caramel and brown sugar in the aroma. Medium bodied with firm bitterness and caramel notes without any sweetness. Very very bitter! More bitter than most IPAs and DIPAs, with sticky character of caramel in body but not in taste. While Stone recommends an enjoy by date, this should be enjoyed at all ages. Finishes clean and bitter. Old review here.

Oaked Arrogant Bastard
You're Still Not Worthy
Poured into a New Belgium snifter. I have had and reviewed this beer before, but when it was within the freshness date and I strongly recommend having it after that date, to let the Oak emerge from the massive shadow of hops. The one in the tasting was past its freshness date and I am glad it was. Looks like Arrogant Bastard, but with a slightly lighter hue and haziness, that is not chill haze. Hops in the aroma had muted and aroma had strong notes of Oak (wood, vanilla) along with the brown sugar and caramel character. Taste had a similar profile and was still massively bitter: I think it'll take years for the bastards to get any less bitter!

Lukcy 13asartd
A Slef Trbitue to 13 Yaers of Arorgnace
Poured into a Lucifer snifter.
Appearance 5/5
Dark ruby, rust brown colored, and slightly hazy with a big and creamy brown head with good head retention and kickass lacing.
Aroma 4.5/5
This one sure is aggressively dry hopped, to the extent that other Bastards that are no short of hops seem pale against this one. The aroma has the most intense herbal and leafy character from dry hopping. Very fresh smelling, and un-bastardly to be frank. My only complaint is the complete dominance of hops on caramel and oak.
Taste 4/5
Strangely light and fruity taste, perhaps because the palate is conditioned to hop assault by now, but most likely because of the freshness introduced by intense dry hopping combined with the dark caramel sweetness. Yes, the sweetness of malts finally shows up among the group and it's not surprising that it's coming from Double Bastard. However, oak still seems absent.
Mouthfeel 5/5
Body is certainly bigger than AB and OAB. Low carbonation, or perceived so because of higher temperature. Clean finish with a long lasting bitterness and hop flavor.
Drinkability 5/5
Very good.
Other
This is Bastard & a half if you ask me! I can't tell if I'd like to age this one because the hop character will fade, but it's a shame that oakiness is completely shadowed in this version.

Double Bastard
Ye Shall Know the Bastard, and the Bastard Shall Set You Free
Poured into a Duvel tulip.
Appearance 5/5
Dark ruby and rusty, with the clarity and depth of molten lava. Big brown head, great retention and lacing.
Aroma 4/5
Pine, citrus and caramel rule. Strangely, not as strong smelling as I thought it would be.
Taste 4/5
Strongly bittersweet. Very sweet compared to other bastards but more bitter as well. Seems like an American Barleywine except that it's much more close to AB than any other beer. Caramel notes are present but it's mostly the hop flavor that dominates. Finish is quite clean given the amount of malts in this ale.
Mouthfeel 5/5
Viscous, thick, coating and overwhelming with low carbonation. Spot on.
Drinkability 5/5
Very good, given the ABV. Can't have it too fast and can't have too much, but whatever you can have will go down damn smooth.
Other
This ale is recommended for aging and I sure as hell will if I can get another bottle.

    After we were done sampling these at least once, someone asked that how do these differ from AIPAs and DIPAs, which makes sense to ask because hops rule these beers. So we cracked open a Bell's Two Hearted. Holy shit! It tasted like a lightly sweet beverage, like a mango-banana smoothie. I kid you not, no bitterness and no hop flavor at all could be perceived. Although the IBUs on the bastards are classified, I have no doubt that they easily exceed 100. On top of that the caramel character is HUGE, like a double, if not triple, ESB, if any such thing were to exist.

Monday, November 29, 2010

90 Minute IPA

9% ABV
90 IBUs
OG?
12 oz bottled 11/02/2010 poured into a New Belgium snifter on 11/26/2010
Appearance 4.5/5
A very “deep” looking beer: so smooth and viscous that it doesn’t splash or foam much even when poured vigorously. Burnt orange hued, slightly hazy with a very creamy and very dense off white head. Good head retention and lacing, signature DIPA looks on this one.
Aroma 3.5/5
Earthy and grassy hop aroma, like green leaves in mud but meant in a good way. Very different from other D/IPAs but not strong enough. Sweet malts are present too.
Taste 3.5/5
Bitter and flavorful with hops but overly malty. Fruitiness is present but seems clashing. Some booze. Taste is better than average but nowhere close to the best. Gets cloying after a while.
Mouthfeel 4/5
Silkier and heavier bodied than most examples of the style with decent carbonation but not biting or crisp.
Drinkability 4/5
Drinkability is alright for a 9% ABV beer but it doesn’t seem like a DIPA.

Unplugged Apple Ale

4% ABV
IBUs?
OG?
12 oz. bottle from 2010 release poured into an Ommegang balloon glass on 11/25/2010.
Appearance 3.5/5
Brilliantly clear, amber-orange, with a white creamy head. Average head retention and some lacing.
Aroma 3.5/5
Weak spice and some apple.
Taste 4/5
Light, but bright, tartness and apple notes with a refreshing sweet spiciness. Medium finish with a good after-apple aftertaste.
Mouthfeel 4/5
Medium-light body and good carbonation.
Drinkability 4.5/5
Easy drinking yet flavorful.

Kaliber (non-alcoholic)

Kaliber
Non-alcoholic beer (<0.5% ABV)

Poured into a beer mug.
Brilliantly clear, dark golden colored with some white head, poor head retention, but some lacing. Looks like a beer and better than many real beers.
Sweet toasty bready aroma with ugly sulfur notes and the exact same taste with plenty of sweetness, zero hops, sulfur notes and a sweetish finish. Body is very decent, and better than many other regular beers, but manages to stay crisp with carbonation. If you're willing to ignore the sulfur and drink cold and fast enough such that the sweet finish fails to bother, it's a decent drink.
Overall a "not horrible" non-alcohol alternative but I'd rather drink Coke etc.
Scores (out of 5): Appearance 3.5; Aroma 2.5; Taste 2.5; Mouthfeel 4; Drinkability 4

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Northern Hemisphere Harvest ale

Northern Hemisphere Harvest ale
Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.
American Pale Ale
6.7% ABV
60-65 IBUs
OG 16.5 Plato, FG 4.0 Plato
24 oz bottle from 2010 batch, bottled on the 266th day of the year (September 23, 2010 I suppose), poured into a wine glass on November 27, 2010.

Appearance 5/5
Slight hazy, amber-red hued with a big, dense head; excellent head retention and lacing. Got clearer with rising temperature.

Aroma 3/5
My apologies for not being in a room devoid of all other smell (pizza, flowers, carpet...) but it's hard to pick any aroma from it. A weak smelling beer! There are bready sweet malts and the hop aroma becomes a little assertive with rising temperature but that's about it. Smells like "beer" was the second opinion I sought. Damn SN, first Celebration and then this! Great tasting beer, as I have written later, but lackluster aroma.

Taste 4.5/5
Riding on a simple, lightly sweet malt base is a solid hop presence that would put many AIPAs to shame! Very flavorful and massively bitter, this beer is a good example of how IBUs could be deceptive, as far as the perceived bitterness goes: as an example, KBS is 70 IBUs and is certainly bitter, among other things, but bitterness would never be central to that beer; while in the case of Northern Hemisphere Harvest, flavorful bitterness reigns supreme with earthy and spicy hop character, and some citrus. The hop profile is reminiscent of Surly Furious to some extent, although this beer precedes Furious by years.

Mouthfeel 5/5
Sticky and resiny hop presence on this medium bodied beer, with medium carbonation and a semi-dry bittering finish.

Drinkability 4.5/5
Very good drinkability but when it comes to throwing back a few, I'd prefer Daisy Cutter because of 1.5% less ABV. Otherwise flawless!

Other
A great beer that celebrates simplicity and balance without any hype or overpricing. This is a wet hop ale I really like even though the wet hop character seemed muted after 2 months of bottling. Seeing as this beer was brewed with Centennial hops, I was looking for a character similar to all Centennial Bell's Two Hearted and Founders Centennial but the fruitiness was missing and this one was very clean with only the bitterness shining. Highly recommended. Did I mention it's less than $5 for a 24 oz. bottle?!

Thursday, November 25, 2010

J.W.Lees Vintage Harvest Ale (1999)

J.W.Lees Vintage Harvest Ale
J.W.Lees
English Barleywine (perhaps the best!)
11.5% ABV
OG?
IBUs?

11.2 oz bottle (1999 vintage) poured into a 25 oz snifter on November 23, 2010 at room temperature.


    Opened with a hiss! Pours clear and deep ruby-garnet, with a big bubbly light tan head with good head retention and some lacing. Even after 11 years in the bottle, it looks just fine. That's something considering many (other) beers from 2005 or later have the been reported to have the most gross looking sediment at this point. I have had this beer and its other versions before and have seen some floating chunks but this particular bottle had none. Regardless, looks wise it's a 5/5.

    The aroma of this beer is like none other in terms of strength. The most prominent notes are of figs, dates and raisins, and of dark caramel, toffee and brown sugar, with some alcohol in the background. This is a familiar aroma, or at least the notes are if not their exact combination, but it is the strength of this intense malty and dried, dark fruity aroma that makes this ale exceptional! The dark sweetness practically jumps out of the glass and keeps inviting to take a sip.

    The taste has notes identical to smell, just stronger. Although there were no hops whatsoever in the aroma, there's a nice cleansing bitterness that comes from hops but feels similar to the slight bitterness and slight astringency of dates and figs. Starts quite sweet followed by the said bitterness and some vinous character in the middle and finishes exceptionally clean for its sweetness. The finish is long with an excellent dried fruit flavor. Overall very well rounded and complex. The body is medium with low carbonation and excellent drinkability! This ale offers a great flavor experience and its taste meets and exceeds the expectations set by aroma.

    One of my favorites and one of the best I ever had, this ale was an eye opener for me that showed me the level of complexity and deliciousness a malt forward beer could achieve without losing its balance.

Scores: Appearance, Aroma, Taste, Mouthfeel, Drinkability 5/5 on all!

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Ola Dubh Special Reserve 12

Ola Dubh Special Reserve 12
Harviestoun Brewery Ltd.
8.00% ABV

11.2 oz 1997 Vintage (September) poured into a 25 oz snifter.

A very impressive bottle, with foil around the neck, two signatures, and a tiny booklet on the neck describing the similarity between the soul of this ale and Highland Park whisky, and describing the different expressions of Highland Park. Classy looks and presentation! I am intrigued! Pours in a clear, very dark brown stream and looks pitch black with a brown bubbly head that stays around and leaves some lacing. A good looking beer for sure. I am even more intrigued at this point, and even before I stick my nose in it, a rich malty aroma is filling the surroundings: massive on figs, rum raisins, dark to burnt caramel, chocolate, and some other things that I'd collectively call Speyside Scotch; and yes, there is soft alcohol present. The aroma is reminiscent of J.W.Lees Harvest Ale to some extent, and I am thinking to myself that I have found another gem from the British Isles.

Cautiously happy with my purchase ($9/11.2 fl oz.), I bring the snifter to my lips and my tastebuds scream WHAT THE FUCK! This can't be! This beer, keeping in mind its aroma and looks, tastes like nothing. Nada. Complex? No. Malts? No. Roast? No. Hops? No. Esters? No. Anything? I don't know. Long after I have let it warm from room temperature to slightly above room temperature, there's some roast in the finish etc. etc. This is such a big fucking letdown that I do not want to waste words. But for the sake of the review, I will: some sweetness that leads towards some astringent roast and leaves a fruit-and-nut chocolate aftertaste riding on a sweet finish.

A very thin body with low carbonation that is entirely against the hopes of strength this beer aroused. Is it a horrible beer? Perhaps not. Is it a beer worth buying and drinking? NO. For the price I paid, I could almost get a four pack of Breakfast Stout for instance, and that would be money well spent. I would rather drink Four Loko than this cloying, yet thin, late term abortion!

Appearance: 5/5
Aroma: 4/5
Taste: 2/5
Mouthfeel: 1/5
Drinkability: 1/5