Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Racer 5

Racer 5
American IPA
Bear Republic Brewing Co.
7% ABV
75+ IBUs

12 oz., undated, poured into a shaker pint glass.

    Pours amber-golden and relatively clear with a small bubbly head. Head retention can't really be commented upon with this head but some lacing is seen. Average looks, especially for an AIPA.

    It's funny how the nose picks different notes at different samplings. When I had Racer 5 for the first time about an year ago, I picked strong tropical fruit notes typical to Centennial hops (Two Hearted Ale); now I pick a spicier note that is even stronger than the faint tropical fruit. The spice is nice and appealing, instead of borderline garlic. But, aroma is not the strong suit of this bottle (or beer?)

    Taste is delicious in one word. Light, sweet frutiness and plenty of spicy to weedy character on a medium-low body with crisp carbonation and a clean finish. Let's nitpick now: the taste is slightly sweet for the body and the bitterness lacking at times: I expect IPAs to be bitter at the back of the palate and this one goes down without that "kick". However, there's bitter aftertaste aplenty to compensate.

    I am really digging the clear, clean flavors; the crispness; and the dry finish that is not quite Duvel-like, but approaches it. Overall it's a good beer that doesn't wreck the wallet or the palate.

Appearance 3/5; Aroma 3/5; Taste 4/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 4.5/5

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Will it keep? And how long?

Too much beer is certainly one of the better problems to have, but once in a while I find myself in a situation in which I have to risk a hangover or dump beer owing to a large format bottle of a high ABV beer, and no one to share it with.

    Not sure where I got this idea except that it is not my own: swing-top bottles to store excess beer in short term. I bought a German dark-ish lager, whose name I don't remember, for about two bucks (tax included) precisely towards the purpose of acquiring a swing-top bottle.

    All I needed now for the experiment was a beer that's considered robust and is drinkable at low carbonation, and is CHEAP. And my palate should know the beer well enough. Old Rasputin fit the bill on all counts.


Side by side: Left one is fresh, right has been in the swing top for 3 days

    Immediately after I pried off the 12 oz. bottle open, I poured half of it into the swing-top in a gentle, but not too gentle of a pour, and clamped the top shut. The reason my pour was not the most gentle one was to release some CO2 to form a layer on the surface of the beer, that would keep oxidation in check... not sure if it makes sense, but my understanding is that some CO2 in the headsapce is good for freshness.

    About 72 hours (7/24/2011) later I poured the hand bottled sample and a fresh sample to try them side by side. The swing top opened with a loud pop hinting that the carbonation was still around. The head that formed settled into a thin ring that lasted forever. The freshly poured sample was typical Old Rasputin, big head with very good retention and lacing.

    I didn't smell anything foul in the older sample, and the smell of the beer was actually stronger, most likely because of the lack of a huge head. Both samples tasted the same with the older one having a better feel (to me) because I find Old Rasputin a little too heavy on the carbonation anyway.

    The differences evened out with time and temperature and both samples smelled/tasted/felt pretty close eventually = Good news. The experiment was successful in short term (that is actually the time horizon of interest) and now I have a container to store surplus beer that I cannot enjoy! In fact, half of the bottle from which I poured the fresh sample is now stored in my swing-top for another tasting that will test the ability of the swing-top to keep the beer "alive" for a couple of weeks :-)

At 2 weeks (8/7/2011):

I poured half of a fresh bottle for tasting against the 3 day old sample, and poured the remaining half of that fresh bottle into the swing top to repeat this tasting at 2 weeks.

The swing top opened with a pop, meaning the beer was not entirely flat. Good.


Side by side: Left one is fresh, right has been in the swing top for 14 days

    Perhaps my hand-bottling was not-so-prompt the last time as this sample because this one poured with an even better head after staying in the swing top for two weeks! The quality of the head is readily seen from the picture, and the head retention and lacing were not bad either!

    As to aroma, there's not much change I can pick between the two samples. However, the aroma of the "AGED" sample is certainly richer, and the differences are huge in the taste. The famous leather note makes an appearance, adding nothing but good. The oxygen exposed beer is certainly mellow and lacks the bite of Old Rasputin, thankfully! It seems sweeter perhaps because the hops haven't held up, but the roast is mellower too.

    However, the key point is that different as the fresh and old samples are, they are not that different: meaning storing surplus beer in a swing top should work on the scale of a couple weeks.

    Half of the freshly opened bottle went into the swing top again for another tasting that will evaluate the differences at a month or so. Cheers!

At ONE month (9/7/2011):

Same procedure this time. Half of the fresh bottle went into the swing top that contained a month old sample prior to the pour. The old sample opened with a loud pop again! Almost like opening a C&C beer. Encouraging!

    The head on the fresh sample was predictably excellent, typical Old Rasputin; but the head on the old sample wasn't bad either. In fact, it was very good, but different --- not as creamy.

Side by side: Left one is fresh, right has been in the swing top for 32 days

    The retention of both samples was good and so was the lacing. The aroma of both samples was similar: dark and malty, but the older sample was certainly richer. The samples were so similar that I had to ask for my girlfriend's blind opinion. She is not a big beer drinker and hates stouts. She had the opinion that the older sample's smell was more abrasive to her and had more powerful coffee notes. She also remarked after a while that the new one "kinda stinks". She and myself picked that the carbonation was higher in the new one.

    The taste is again similar, BUT the older one stays longer on the palate precisely because of lower carbonation. Assuming that that the reader already knows how Old Rasputin tastes freshly poured, I will say that the older sample has developed/heightened flavor that almost tastes of proper aging. However, it should be noted that the carbonation is still higher than your usual Imperial Stout.

    Bottomline being that a month in the swing top hasn't done the beer any bad, and perhaps some good. At the same time, the two samples were so close that I had to ask for a different opinion. Good news.

At 3+ months (12/11/2011):

I am down to my last sample and there's no fresh bottle to compare it with. Although at this point I am fully convinced that beer is not that delicate, here it is for completeness.

    Opened with a pop and the CO2 pushed the cap out, encouraging. The head formed in cascades like a typical Imperial Stout. Good head size, retention and lacing. Had I not known, I wouldn't be able to tell based on the looks that this sample wasn't fresh and had sat in a swing top for 3 months. Like the previous sample, the head was more bubbly and less creamy in comparison to the fresh bottles I have had. In absolute terms it was mighty creamy.

The sample has been in the swing top for 95 days

    Good aroma too: standard Imperial Stout, malty, dark fruity. No off flavors either. But the beer has changed, it's not the fresh out of the bottle Old Rasputin. Stronger coffee, slightly mellow roast. Perfect carbonation and a silky feel. Overall much more chocolaty and contrary to what one would think, a better beer than fresh Old Rasputin. Your mileage may vary :/

    In summary, using a swing top promptly seems like a great way to save beer for later. All my samples were refrigerated at all times. All the notes are from my palate unless noted. I have tried my best to be consistent, but it is impossible to eliminate all variations.

Why not try it with a hop forward beer?!

    I fully understand that Imperial Stouts and such are often heavily hopped, and that it's necessary to balance the beer. However, it cannot be denied that Imperial Stouts showcase their malt/adjunct/barrel character while other hoppy beers like DIPAs flaunt their hops. And hops are delicate, especially the late additions.

    But the fact remains that DIPAs often match the big stouts and Quads in their alcohol content, which makes the problem of having too much beer pertinent. To probe this, I repeated the experiment of storing excess beer on a very tasty DIPA, Galactic Double Daisy Cutter. Since I did not want to push it, I kept it in a storage bottle for only 24 hours but the results were encouraging and I might try this on a longer timescale. But then I have seen the bitterness go down in as less as 72 hours (for Old Rasputin) so I won't keep my hopes too high.

Below are the pictures of the fresh and the stored sample:


Left one (w/ bottle in picture) is fresh while the right one is a day old.

    As my original review indicates, and also evidenced in the picture, this beer did not have a massive head to begin with. However, I did not notice any difference in carbonation/head size over 24 hours.

    The tropical fruit and dank notes of fresh sample were present equally in the both samples to the best of my memory of the fresh sample. The day old sample is just as bitter and crisp as the fresh one and doesn't even remotely resemble a beer left open overnight. Of course, the old sample was capped immediately and kept refrigerated at all times.

    My palate cannot detect any signs of deterioration whatsoever in the beer, and that is a reason good enough to justify this experiment. After all, all I wanted was a little more time to finish my beer ;-)

    So, if you're hating an otherwise coveted beer that your friends would totally drink, or you think that you can't/shouldn't/mustn't man up and kill it right f'in now, get a swing top and put the darn thing in. More likely than not, it will be okay. Cheers to responsible and moderate drinking!

Friday, July 22, 2011

Weihenstephaner Hefeweissbier

Weihenstephaner Hefeweissbier
Hefeweizen
Brewery Weihenstephan
5.4% ABV
24 IBUs

    After a bad experience with this beer on draft, I decided to give this rather old bottle (distribution fail I suppose) a shot because the draft version (that I sampled) doesn't do it justice. 16.9 oz., batch # 3081 (bottled Feb. 2011) poured into a weizen glass. ~ $4/bottle.

    Hazy light golden with a nice, moussy white head; excellent head retention, and great lacing. Perfect looks. No contest here. Aroma is perfume and spice, but not so much banana and bread; and the spice is random rather than dead on clove.

    Tastes rather bland with mild fruitiness, ample kick of clove, and a finish that is a tad bitter for the style. Not saying that this one needs to be in line with the style because isn't this the beer that defines it?! Some lemony tartness, but bitterness is slightly heavy.

    Mouthfeel is real nice. Crisp yet not overcarbonated, but the bitterness lingers and causes me to doubt the interity of this bottle.

Overall average --- This sample, not questioning what flows at the biergarten

Appearance 5/5; Aroma 3.5/5; Taste 3/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 3/5

Hop in the Dark


Left one is fresh while the right one is about year and a half old.

Hop in the Dark
Cascadian Dark Ale
Deschutes Brewery
6.9% ABV
70 IBUs

    Because of a wrongly printed "Best After" date, I ended up aging a bottle of Hop in the Dark. When this year's version came out, it was time for a side by side of two bottles, one labeled Best After 05/29/2010 and another Best By 11/28/11. I suppose there's a difference of about an year and a half between the two, with the newer one being quite fresh.

Clear dark brown with a good tan colored head. Good lacing and retention.

    Newer one is pungent with hops while older one has developed some oxidized character. Smells nice to me since I am a fan of sherry port notes (in moderation) Fruitiness is present in both to varying degrees with the older being earthier. Roasty chocolate.

    Taste is bitter and roasty with medium fruitiness. The tartness of roast shines more in the older, while the newer is certainly greener. The roast is too strong --- it's a porter for all I care!

    Mouthfeel is rather thin and AIPA-ish. Carbonation is spot on. Same on both. Finishes dry and astringent. Overall it's average to good.

Scores: Appearance 4.5/5; Aroma 3.5/5; Taste 3.5/5; Mouthfeel 3/5; Overall 4/5

Dancing Man

Dancing Man Wheat
Hefeweizen
New Glarus Brewing Co.
7.2% ABV

12 oz. poured into a weizen-esque glass on 07/21/2011. Bottle code 1531 = about month and a half old.

    Pours golden with a big, creamy white colored head. Appropriately hazy. The head retention is average for the head size, but the lacing looks good. Smells very good --- complex, but refreshing. Bready sweet with notes of clove spice and perhaps lemon? Unmistakable cinnamon pops up soon enough. Very nice!

    Refreshingly sweet, with ample fruitiness but unfortunately not a hint of tartness :/ Oddly, I find this beer more bitter at the back than I'd like a hefeweizen to be, and yet the finish is borderline cloying. Fault on two counts in my opinion. Yet, nothing is offensive about it and I will certainly deem it above average.

    I am digging the feel of this beer. Although it seems to be on the heavier side of hefes, that's the way I like most of my beers. Carbonation is present but is not enough to tackle the residual sweetness.

    Overall, a good hefeweizen and especially so when fresh. However, if I had to choose between US brewed hefes, I will take Kellerweiss over this one.

Note: Originally I had given this beer a 4/5 on the Overall; however, having checked the ABV, I have to slash it down to 2.5 (slightly below average). 7.2% ABV! Seriously?! Why? And yes, I WILL take Kellerweiss any day.

Appearance 4/5; Aroma 4/5; Taste 3.5/5; Mouthfeel 4.5/5; Overall 2.5/5

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Girardin Gueuze 1882 (Black Label)

Girardin Gueuze 1882 (Black Label)
Brouwerij Girardin
Gueuze
5% ABV
375 ml. cork (2011) and caged, sent by dvelcich, poured into a shaker pint since I don't have a gueuze glass. Thanks Dan!

    Fairly clear, orange-red hued with a medium off white head. Decent head retention; some lacing is noted. Initial aroma is all acid and barnyard funk, but lemon and pepper notes follow soon. While at room temperature, the aroma gets borderline spicy. Quite complex.

    Spicy, funky, refreshingly tart with a bite at the end that's acidic (well it's a lambic, isn't it?), slightly bitter, and tannic with oak I assume. Well carbonated and very dry. As noted, refreshing but not overwhelmingly sour.

Appearance 4, Aroma 4, Taste 4, Mouthfeel 5, Overall 4

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Devil Dancer

Devil Dancer
"Triple" IPA
Founders Brewing Co.
12% ABV
112 IBUs
OG?

12 oz., bottled 06/17/2011 poured into a New Belgium balloon.
Massive in complexity, the huge malt character balances the insane amount of alphas used to create it. At an incredible 112 IBUs, it's dry-hopped with ten hop varieties.
    Beautiful copper red with good clarity and a very good alabaster head. Good head retention and lacing. Aroma is dominantly fresh pine, to the extent of being cool and almost minty. Some garlic notes lurk at the background. No alcohol is felt in the smell.

    Tastes strongly, overwhelmingly, and one dimensionally bitter. Insanely bitter and at the threshold of my comfort level. Whoever thinks that beer cannot get any more bitter than their favorite/most hated D/IPA/Strong Ale/Barleywine needs to try this one. An unsurprising and powerfully bitter finish that doesn't let any sweetness whatsoever be felt. Alcohol is felt in its taste and warming effect. Body is medium and carbonation is on the lower side.

    This might be the most bitter beer I have ever had (this or Hopsickle), and is certainly not very drinkable. But then, nor is Black Tuesday. I will give it to Founders that it's not a sweet mess like many higher ABV D/IPAs and if it had been lower on the booze coefficient, I will rate the taste higher.

    However, the complexity of this beer is only on paper. It might be dry hopped with 10 hop varieties and might have a huge malt character, but the only quality that really shines is bitterness. An extreme beer and a punishment on the palate, I am not going to seek it out under normal circumstances. However, this might be one of the very few beers that can provide comfort in an acute case of Lupulin Threshold Shift.

Appearance: 4.5/5; Aroma 3.5/5; Taste 4/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 4/5

Friday, July 8, 2011

Bitter Brewer

Bitter Brewer
not-really-a British Bitter
Surly Brewing Co.
4% ABV
37 IBUs
OG 9.5 degrees Plato
Color 11 degrees SRM

16 oz., canned 05/25/2011 poured into a shaker pint glass.

Murky amber, with a small light khaki head. Reasonable amount of bubbles stick around, and quite respectable lacing for the head. Good looking for the style.

Not as hoppy as a fresher can, but decidedly fruitier. If I had to pick one, I will pick apricots, but its just generally fruity. Tastes fruity too, with bitterness towards the back and a drying, tannic finish. Good at its size. Herbal and earthy.

The body is fitting and the carbonation aptly high. Drinkability is where this beer really shines. I can safely say that I buy this *seasonal* beer most. A great choice at the bars and parties, one of the few American beer that pack a flavor punch at low alcohol levels.

Appearance: 4/5; Aroma 3/5; Taste 3.5/5; Mouthfeel 4.5/5; Overall 4.5/5

Friday, July 1, 2011

Joe's MONSTER tasting, etc.

    Joe from Beeradvocate recently hosted a mammoth tasting, single handedly, and I got a chance to try many beers that I may not get again, most notably Rare Bourbon County Brand Stout, Black Tuesday, and Kate the Great. And a vertical of Dark Lord (08 - 10). And Fungus Teamungus. And Brown Recluse... the list goes on!

Mad props to Joe for sharing and hospitality! Here's the lineup:



    I could review only 2 beers at this tasting; later I reviewed Kate the Great 09 and Dark Knight. Here are the reviews:


Rare Bourbon County Brand Stout

Imperial Stout (aged for 2 years in Pappy van Winkle 23 yo barrels)
Goose Island Beer Co.
13% ABV
60 IBUs
Bottle # 3580. Thanks Joe for the chance to try this beer! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Looks identical to its siblings (BCBS, Coffee, Vanilla) --- inky black, viscous, no head, no lacing. Yet pure awesome. More than a review, this is just comparison to the regular BCBS, and the most noticeable feature in this great brew is the *absence* of booze, at least in comparison to the regular.

    Chocolate, more chocolate and spice (like a lightly spiced hot chocolate if I am making any sense), vanilla, dark fruit, and huge malts akin to a fine barleywine.

    Fleeting tartness on a massive dry fruit and chocolate base. Long, rich, very luxurious, and still neither cloying, nor boozy. Perfect taste. Feels a tad sharper and thinner than regular BCBS and I suppose this is where the trade off lies --- the regular BCBS, fresh, is a monster that I find utterly undrinkable at room temperature. This one, although slightly less silky, is a
delight. By the old rating system, the drinkability is a perfect 5.

    A great beer that I got to try because of Joe. I wonder though that how much does it differ from a well cellared 08 BCBS? Is it really worthy of the tag? I doubt it.

Is it good? Fuck yeah!

Appearance: 5/5; Aroma 4/5; Taste 5/5; Mouthfeel 4.5/5; Overall 4.5/5


Black Tuesday

Imperial Stout aged in bourbon barrels for over a year
The Bruery
~18% ABV
40 IBUs

    2010, I believe, shared very generously in a great tasting by Joe. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Black Tuesday is, ironically, not "black" enough; frankly it belongs more in the -bal Barleywine/Strong Ale territory than among Imperial Stouts. Looks, smell, taste... on all counts.

    The aroma is an overload of delicious things: vanilla, sweet booze, and tons of dark fruit. Very appealing, if a little rough.

    The taste has a lot of bourbon, and more. Vanilla, obviously; and rum soaked dried dark fruit with plenty of bitter-sweet-tart darkness. Think prunes and raisins, but more complex and infinitely boozier.

    I can't believe that this beer is appearing thin on the palate and I think that it has to be with the insanely high ABV. Even though it's clean, it's still very sweet. I am loving the taste but I am certainly not digging the mouthfeel, that is into the moderate strength liqueur territory.

    A brewing achievement but not beer like; delicious nonetheless. I am very glad that I got to try it, and I don't think I could have without Joe's generosity. Thanks again!

Appearance: 4/5; Aroma 4/5; Taste 4.5/5; Mouthfeel 3/5; Overall 4/5


Kate the Great

Imperial Stout aged in Port wine barrels
Portsmouth Brewery
12% ABV

    2009 poured into a snifter. Thanks drDogBeer. Also thanks to Joe for giving a taste of 2011. Review is of 2009.

    Some people say that this was an infected batch; others say that it's merely a strong wine character. Either way, it is more tart than most beers of its kind.

    Very dark but not black, with a dark brown head that eventually gives away to a nice and consistent ring. It's amazing that the roast survives in the aroma and taste, even though there are a plenty of other things going on --- dry fruit, specifically prunes and dates, and lot of wine. Tastes tart and sweet, bright with some coffee, but very very heavy on fruit. Liqueur-ish. Boozy but never interfering, and finishes with massive roast. Very layered with hints of chocolate at times.

There's a strange aftertaste that I don't quite like.

    Mouthfeel is spot on; carbonation keeps the finish clean although I would prefer a longer finish. Overall very good, but a little too tart.

Appearance: 4.5/5; Aroma 4/5; Taste 4/5; Mouthfeel 4.5/5; Overall 4/5


Dark Knight

Baltic Porter (and a lot more)
Barley John's Brew Pub
    "This double fermented porter was aged in Heaven Hill Bourbon barrels for exactly 1 year. Historically the strength has clocked in at 13-14% abv - this batch has not yet been tested. Huge roasted barley presence with a bourbon and oak finish. Served in 5.5oz pours."

    5.5 oz, served in a wine glass, I think. It was dark outside so I cannot really comment on the finer details of the color that seems very dark brown to me. The beers looks very smooth and inky, with a tiny ring for head. Swirling forces some bubbles but mostly legs. This is a heavy hitter!

    Vanilla, dark fruit, coconut, and massive bourbon in the aroma. This one is not very "coating" on the palate and relatively thin for a beer of its size. Quite bitter tasting, or shall I say not as sweet as I expected?

    Mostly vanilla, oak (bourbon), hints of dark fruit, and massive roast. Strong on alcohol taste and very dry finishing because of roast and alcohol. A great marriage of roast and booze, this one feels like sipping Scotch, but with roast and extra bitterness.

    Harsh at times, but enjoyable nonetheless. Every element of this monster is tainted by booze AND it's working as far as I am concerned! This is the thinnest and most dry barrel aged "dark" beer that I have had, and I am liking it. Recommended.

Appearance: 5/5; Aroma 4.5/5; Taste 4/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 4/5

A few scattered reviews

Old Engine Oil

Black Ale
Harviestoun Brewery
6% ABV
11.2 oz. bottle (~$5 inclusive of tax) poured into a pint glass. No age statement.

    Pours dark brown and viscous as described with a milky-brown head. While the head falls off quick, a sheet of foam manages to stick around over the course of the beer. 4/5

    Smells of sugars, roast and spices more than anything else to me which is quite contrary to chocolate notes I was expecting. 3/5

    Fans of this beer might detect all sorts of flavors in it but I find it to be predominantly bitter with hops and roast; and sweet, rather underattenuated. I am a little biased in my opinion because I hated the Ola Dubh 12, that uses this beer, or some cousin of its, as the base beer. However, I have to give it to this beer that it lets the drinker experience a big stout taste without the big alcohol. Still, I find the bitterness over the top, the sweetness too cloying, and most of all, the beer soulless. 3/5

    Mouthfeel is perhaps the biggest strength of this beer and it can rival bigger stouts! Smooth and silky with just hints of carbonation. This beer will shine when paired with something even sweeter. 4.5/5

    Overall, as remarked over and over, while it could pass for a bigger, badder beer, it needs some soul in it. Barely above average if you ask me. 3.5/5.

    Note: Added some Talisker 10 yo Single Malt Scotch in it later because this one seemed like a good candidate for fooling around. The aroma of this pseudo-aged beer became incredibly good, but the contributions to the taste were minimal. While the aroma was full of everything delicate about Talisker, the taste inherited a touch of peat smoke at the end.


The Wizard

Short's Brewing Company
American Barleywine (aged on raisins)
11% ABV
Sent as an extra by lurchingbeast. Thanks Frank! 12 oz poured into a New Belgium globe.

    Dark amber, fairly clear but not brilliantly so with a medium head and good retention. Typical strong ale aroma --- dried raisins and apricots, malts, and hint of dank hops.

    The taste is darkly sweet but nearly not as much as I'd like. A roasty bitter finish with a kiss of booze at the end. Too much roasty for its own good! Also, it claims to be brewed with raisins but raisin character is fairly typical and nothing extraordinary. In fact, this ale is pretty ordinary :/

Appearance: 4/5; Aroma: 3.5/5; Taste 3/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 3.5/5


Weihenstephaner Hefeweissbier

Hefeweizen
Brewery Weihenstephan
5.4% ABV
24 IBUs

On tap at Bullfrog, Downtown MPLS.

    I am divided about whether or not I should review this beer --- I have spent quite some time chasing this one down in the Twin Cities area and it seems impossible to find fresh bottles of this beer. This is May already and haven't seen one that's bottled in 2011! Finally someone posted that it's on tap at Bullfrog, so I figured that I would go give it a try.

    From here on I am not sure if it should be the establishment's review or this beer's. Served in a glass that's not like any beer glass I have seen --- like a thin balloon, with the said glass filled to brim. Head you ask? Did you say lacing? The color is a murky orange and cloudiness is in line with the style.

    Lots of off aromas that I initially thought were because of yeast. Smells like saison spilled in a fucking pharmacy.

    Taste is just as bad: lots of bandaid in the middle, and unmistakable cooked corn towards the finish. Where's the brightness? Banana? Clove?

    A dull, flavorless sweetness and some bitterness at the end. Mouthfeel is ok, crisp, light bodied etc. etc., but at this point I don't fucking care. Surprisingly I downed my glass in usual time, so either I am cheap, or this beer is so good that it stays drinkable in spite of horrible treatment. I have had it from bottle (several months old, yeah) and I recall that it was way better, so it has to be the tap lines.

I will still seek fresher bottles and re review this one asap!

Appearance: 2.5/5; Aroma: 2/5; Taste 2/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 3/5


London Pride

English Pale Ale
Fuller Smith & Turner PLC
4.7% ABV
Served on cask in an Imperial pint glass at the Brit's Pub, Minneapolis.

    Golden and smooth, with a small head with fine foam. Good head retention and lacing for the size.

    Smells is equal parts malts and hops --- honey, and herbs (but not to the extent of being pungent). Tastes of ripe, lush fruit with a mild bitterness, and rich honey and earthy hop flavor. Well carbonated, but not overly so; great body that's not heavy but not watery by any means.

    There's bitterness is towards the end, but it does not stay on the palate. Finish is fairly clean. Overall, I liked it. Especially good for a 4.7% ABV beer.

Appearance: 4/5; Aroma: 3.5/5; Taste 4/5; Mouthfeel 4/5; Overall 4/5


Big John

Imperial Stout
Goose Island Beer Co.
11.5% ABV
60 IBUs

    Pours silky and dark with a small brown head. Sub-par retention and lacing, but forgivable. Dark brown highlights are seen.

    Not a whole lot going on in terms of aroma -- the typical stout aroma with ample amount of alcohol, but not harsh. Smells sweet and perhaps too much so because of the alcohol.

    Not a huge fan of the taste either: this one seems a lot like BCS in terms of its shortcomings, without any of the awesomeness that BCS brings to the table. Still, quite "rich" with a strong dark fruit acidity (think raisins) and substantial roast. It should be noted that the roast is still way less than your average RIS, and I don't resent it.

    Mouthfeel is a killer -- silky, smooth, coating and low on the carbonation. Overall, I wasn't as impressed as I was with Nightstalker, that is vastly underrated IMO.

Appearance: 3.5/5; Aroma: 3/5; Taste 3.5/5; Mouthfeel 5/5; Overall 4/5


The Don

Supposedly ESB
Town Hall Brewery
8% ABV
    "This Special Bitter was made in memory of Don Younger of the famed Horse Brass Pub in Portland, OR."

    Clear and deep honey orange with an off white creamy head. The head retention and lacing are good for the the size of the head.

    With rich residual sugars, notes of fruit (banana, caramelized apple), and dark fruit, this beer has the potential for greatness. And still, the presence of this beer is unimpressive. The body is thin and the excellent flavors don't seem to last on the palate.

    Finish is slightly tannic, noticeably so with warmth, and sweet, even though strong bitterness kicks in towards the end. I think that the bitterness is a little discordant.

Eventually the alcohol gets noticeable to an interfering extent and definitely affects the scores.

As noted, there is potential for greatness but needs tweaking. And the lack of body is a minus.

Appearance: 4/5; Aroma: 4/5; Taste 3.5/5; Mouthfeel 3/5; Overall 4/5