Friday, January 27, 2012

King Henry


    22 oz bottled 10-08-2011 poured into my favorite 25 oz snifter. I can't thank Matt (match1112) enough for such a smooth and rewarding trade.

    Chestnut hued with some milky haze, King Henry pours deep and mystifying with a small tan crown atop. Unlike old English Barleywines (J. W. Lees 10+ years old vintages), the crown of this King is very creamy and smooth. Retention is just as good as one could expect from a beer of this kind, and swirling results in legs rather than lace. It's potent and it doesn't hide its potency.

    Aroma is filled with notes of my favorite dessert: buttery toffee. I imagine this is how it would smell in Old Delhi's sweet shops cooking sohan-halwa. Chocolate, figs and sweet alcohol follow. So smooth, so decadent. This is just as good as my favorite JW! Tastes sweet and rich with plenty of toffee and chocolate; can't say if the chocolate character is coming from its own malt bill or from Bourbon County and Pappy, but it's certainly doing the trick. Slightly tannic and cleansing at the back, very much reminiscent of figs and dates. Some toasted coconut here and there. Sure there is a lot of alcohol, and it's felt not only in the warmth, but also in the taste, and yet it is so smooth! Reminds me of Macallan, if that makes any sense.

    The body is big but not syrupy, and the finish not as long as I desire. It seems that the high alcohol is having a cleansing effect on the palate. On a second thought, a Scotch like maltiness lingers, but it's faint and obscure. An incredibly bold and big beer, and just as good as my few favorite Barleywines. And this does not need an age either. I love it and so will you.

4, 5, 5, 4.5, 4.5

Big Bear Black Stout

Big Bear Black Stout
Bear Republic
8.1% ABV

Bomber poured into a snifter.

    Black Stout? More like brown stout. Looks dark brown and rather watery with a small head in spite of a vigorous pour. Head retention is alright for whatever it's worth, and there's some sticky lacing too.

    Aroma is fairly standard with dark maltiness, roast, and possibly spice. Tastes sweet, sharp, and strongly roasty. Bitterness is thankfully only medium. Roast pretty much rules this beer but doesn't get tiring.

    Mouthfeel is extremely disappointing with not much to show for an 8.1% "stout" beer... tastes just too watery for its size, perhaps because of the high carbonation. Overall unimpressive.

3, 3, 3, 3, 3

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Double Simcoe

Double Simcoe
Weyerbacher
DIPA, 9% ABV

    12 oz bottle with childish artwork (Weyerbacher rules!) poured into a snifter. Double Simcoe looks like a big beer, a huge beer. A little too hazy with the apparent viscosity of a barleywine, and a creamy head that is darker than most DIPAs. The head forms slowly, in cascades, again like a big and thick barleywine, stays around, and leaves excellent lacing on the snifter.

    I am not digging the aroma much that is hoppy in a very generic manner with some sweet undertones. Taste is better with firm bitterness that the palate takes a while getting used to. After that lush tropical fruit flavors are delivered in ample quantities, complemented nicely by the residual sweetness. The haze in the looks disappears with warmth and citrus flavors also come forward.

    Although it clocks in only (ha!) 9% ABV, the beers seems significantly more alcoholic in its warming character. However, it's smooth, and not fusely. Finish is medium and quite clean for the big body among DIPAs. Carbonation is medium-high, and is very welcome. Overall a solid, available and affordable DIPA that is rather mellow (think Maharaja/90 minute/Oracle/Hopslam).

4.5, 2.5, 4, 4.5, 4

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Surly Smoke

On tap at Stub's. Served in a 10 oz chalice like glass.

    Looks black and not-so-viscous with a small dark brown head. Tough to comment on other aspects of the looks. The smoke leaps out of the glass, followed by roast, dark fruit, and coffee. Not as clean as lagers typically are.

    Taste is equally "dirty" with notes of dried tart berries, powerful roast, and a strong presence of smoke in the finish. Medium body and high carbonation that's not to my liking but is apparently fitting for the style. Overall a good beer, but not for everyone.

4, 4, 4, 4, 4

Rogue Hazelnut Brown Nectar

Hazelnut Brown Nectar
22 oz "bomber" poured into a pint glass.

Pours a milky looking dark amber/light brown color with a moderate tan colored head. Medium head retention and lacing. Aroma is not remarkable or interesting. Pretty ho hum. Tastes (and looks) very different from what I expected... sharp and tart with a nutty finish and a long nutty aftertaste. Medium body, some residual sweetness, and high carbonation. A good but unremarkable beer with an odd acidity is the overall impression. The finish and the aftertaste are solid though.

4, 2, 3, 4, 4

Friday, January 20, 2012

Recent tastings

Third Coast Old Ale

10.2% ABV

Poured into a snifter. Notes are from a vertical tasting (2008, 2009, 2010, 2011)

    Deep rust colored, clear with sediment settled at the bottom, thick and viscous looking with a small bubbly head. The aroma is typical strong ale. The oldest one seemed to be oxidized when cold but improved with temperature. Strong notes of grain, general sweetness, dried fruit and some alcohol. The alcohol is soft and sweet, not harsh and fusel.

    Strong bitterness that clearly falls with age, dried fruit flavors, flavors from hops (not pine/citrus though), and supporting sweetness. Nothing outstanding. Between the group, everyone seemed to prefer it fresher, and the freshest too was just an above average beer. Mouthfeel was alright for it's kind, but the beer was not remarkable.

4, 4, 4, 4.5, 3

World Wide Stout

Very high ABV

Bottle from 2010 poured into a tasting snifter.

    I brought this beer with me to a tasting w/ label removed as a "surprise beer"... however, it didn't look too stout-y to me either. Dark brown at best w/ predictably no head.

    Aroma is what people have said over and over: nail polish remover and roast. When cold (or with an unaccustomed nose?), the beer is overpoweringly acetone like but partially transitions to its roasty side in time. Taste follows the nose with notes of solvents, coffee and roast.

    Perhaps because of its high alcohol, this beer doesn't seem very thick. Compared to alcoholic beverages of similar strength (port), the body is medium at best. Overall it's not bad and much more bearable later on. I have heard good things about this with age... I hope to luck into a bottle someday. But I sure am not buying this at ~10 dollars. For less than twice the price per oz., Black Tuesday is an infinitely better example of an extreme stout. This one was... weird.

3, 2, 2, 3, 1

Smoke from the Oak (Wine barrel aged imperial version)

Shared generously by maximum12. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Perhaps the smokiest beer I have ever had to date! Very strong notes of smoke and char with only a tiny bit of dark fruit character coming through in the nose. The taste is mellower than the nose, although still mighty smoky. Dark and raisin-y with decent amount of roast and tannins leading towards a mildly astringent finish. A very unique beer but lacking balance.

4, 4, 4, 4, 3

Smoke from the Oak (Apple brandy barrel aged imperial version)

Shared at a tasting by Sender. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Had it immediately after the wine barrel version, perhaps that's the reason for this to seem mellow? The slightly lower smokiness was certainly better but I was not able to make sense of the other notes in the aroma, not one bit.

    I was expecting something like Matt, but this was at a different level, softer but not nearly as delicious. Vanilla perhaps, and some booze. Muddled fruitiness riding on smoke was my overall impression.

4, 3.5, 4, 4, 3

Smoke from the Oak (Rum barrel aged imperial version)

Shared by Sender, along with the Apple brandy version. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    This was the last in the series followed by the Wine and the Apple brandy version, and the most disappointing one. I went in expecting spice, chocolate and vanilla, and found none :/ The smoke was fine but in my opinion it should have had something more to offer than just a smoked porter, especially for the hype and what not. Nothing new to say, it's just an above average smoked beer.

4, 3, 3, 4, 3

Weyerbacher Rapture

Shared by a kind soul. I can't recall who, but thanks nonetheless! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Burnt amber hued with plenty of haze. The head was poor, hardly a few bubbles hanging around. But the bottles at a tasting table get shaken up quite a bit, so I will give it the benefit of doubt.

    Strong lemon funk... yum! Slightly sweet and moderately tart after getting used to. Finishes slightly bitter and very very dry. The carbonation is up there and the beer is very mouth filling. I loved the lemony notes in it! There was an odd softness that might have been from the dregs, so I will let that go. A good beer for sure.

4, 4, 4, 4, 4

Commander Barleywine

Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Perhaps the first Minnesota barleywine for me. I am glad that it was at the tasting because my first impression of this beer (on tap at the brewery) was NOT good. Poured into a tasting snifter. Thanks for sharing!

    Looks the usual: dark amber, molten look of barleywines. Medium head/retention. Here's the thing with this beer, it's a different barleywine that takes some time getting used to because of the strong notes of green cardamom. Smells like an Indian dessert, frankly: sweet w/ plenty of green cardamom thrown in.

    Tastes similar with sticky caramel coming forward, and finishes with a mild bitterness. I think it will age beautifully. It's one of the rare beers in which alcohol is tasting delicious. Medium bodied for a barleywine, and a good example keeping the ingredients in mind.

4, 4, 4, 4, 4

Upland Peach Lambic

    Bottled 10/2010. Poured into a tasting snifter. Thanks whitemomba for the trade. Gushed slightly, but not a drop of the beer was lost :-)

    Color of peach with plenty of peach... there were pieces of peach floating in it! Quite big head with good retention and overall spritz-y-ness.

    Aroma is nice funk and acid with only hints of peach. Tastes quite tart and moderately peachy with excellent acidity and effervescence. Very dry and refreshing, I loved it.

4, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 4

Marshal Zhukov's Imperial Stout

2010 vintage shared by rebis1bear. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Is this the base beer for Hunaphu's? I don't know but these sure are related. Actually black and way darker than other stouts. I know that dark as sin/night/etc is an adjective thrown around much, but damn! this IS as dark as black hole ;-)

    Not much of a head here, but some thick legs are seen. Aroma is sweet and charred, but the taste is way overpowering and complex, in a very delicious way. Residual sugars, char, roast, coffee... I could go on but in summary, Zhukov's tastes of roasted fire whatever that means. Damn delicious, a straight up stout with a velvety smoothness, and excellent taste!

4, 4, 4.5, 4.5, 4.5

Marshal Zhukov's Imperial Stout - Cedar Aged (Humidor Series)

2011 sent by Dan. Thanks! Poured into a tasting snifter.

    Looks like all its relatives --- extremely dark and thick. I am intrigued. Off to aroma and taste: this is dark, thick, roasty... everything, and then there's wood, lots and lots of it!

    I read somewhere that this is like drinking furniture. Although I mean the same in a good way, I don't know how to say it differently. Drinks like tasty furniture? Quite thick on its own but a tad thinner than regular Zhukov's that's perhaps my favorite of the CC stouts I have had till date.

    Different than any other stout that I have had, this one's like something Dogfish Head would make. Very good but I can see it getting tiring for a 750 ml.

4, 4.5, 4, 4, 4.5

Barrel Aged Sexual Chocolate

Thanks for sharing... I can't remember exactly but I think it was Nils. Poured into a tasting snifter.

    This is one beer I am not going to chase, ever! Looks lightweight, tastes weak, and feels thin. Perhaps it was the palate destruction but many seemed to agree that it was unremarkable in more than one way. Garnet-brown as opposed to black with some bubbles here and there (in its defense it was a small pour).

    Contrary to expectations, the notes of chocolate/vanilla were weak. Taste was alright but what is the average barrel aged stout it should be compared to? I wouldn't even recall drinking this had I not taken notes, thoroughly ordinary.

4, 3, 3, 3, 3

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Choklat

Choklat
Souther Tier
Imperial Stout brewed w/ chocolate
10% ABV

    2011 bottle poured into a New Belgium balloon glass. Pours in a moderately thick looking dark brown stream, quintessential Imperial Stout looks. Medium dark tan head w/ average retention and lacing.

    Aroma is decadent, massive chocolate and ample malty sweetness. Reminds of a barrel aged stout, almost, in its dessert character. Southern Tier's blackwater series beers are infamous for their sweetness but to me sweetness is not enough in this one. Bitter, at times excruciatingly so, with robust dark chocolate and roast. This beer is stout first and I like that part.

    They haven't gone easy on the hops for sure, but hops take a back seat in flavor that is certainly for the best. However, it's not the hops but the roast that is getting tiring slowly. Roast tiring in an Imperial Stout you say? Well, I think that the body is struggling to stand up to the astringency.

    Overall, it's nearly not as bad as it is sometimes made out to be. First few sips are actually great. But this beer is riddled with its flaws:

  • Overly charred with lacking body (for its taste)
  • Hint of booziness
  • Some off flavors that bring cardboard to mind (I don't think it's the oxidation though, this is a young bottle)

4, 4, 3.5, 3.5, 4

FFF Alpha Klaus

Alpha Klaus
Kickin' fresh Christmas Porter brewed with Mexican sugar among other things. What's with FFF and different sugars?

Bomber poured into a Lion stout mug. Thanks Dan!

    Beautiful looking beer, dark brown and clear with a chocolaty, thick and creamy head that formed in cascades. Great lacing and retention as well. Smells of roasted malts, chocolate and general sweetness. No hops in the aroma whatsoever.

    Tastes sweet and chocolaty but the bitterness quickly takes over. Finishes quite bitter and slightly roasty. I understand this is Alpha King's cousin and all but the bitterness, frankly, is clashing. The aftertaste is rather empty too. However, the biggest culprit is the rather thin body that makes the beer taste rather empty.

    Overall a good porter but unbalanced for no good reason. Not in the same league as Edmund Fitzgerald or Cutthroat.

4.5, 4, 3.5, 2, 4

Blithering Idiot

Blithering Idiot
English Barleywine
11.1% ABV

Purchased 2010. Poured into a New Belgium balloon.

    Pours the right color, burnt amber and everything, but has an odd, stale look to it in terms of haze and the tiny bubbles. Can't really comment on the retention on the lacing, in spite of a hearty pour.

    The aroma of caramel is certainly delighting and so are the figs and dates. Not up there with the best examples but definitely good.

    All the notes from aroma are present in the taste, especially the caramel sweetness, but there is a definite bitterness. Oddly it seems that the (slight) bitterness makes this beer and aging anymore will be counteractive. Like other big beers, temperature is the key to enjoyment.

    Mouthfeel is alright but the carbonation is a tad high, just a tad. Overall just an average English Barleywine. The same quality/merit as Third Coast Old Ale. I like it but I might not purchase it again.

3, 4, 4, 4, 3.5

Breakfast!

Left to right: Founders Breakfast Stout 2008 - 2011, Canadian Breakfast Stout (2011 Fall), and Kentucky Breakfast Stout (2011 Spring)

Breakfast Stout vertical
    Thanks Nils for just giving the Breakfast Stout vertical away. Many people consider this beer unworthy of aging but I and my friends really wanted to see how it develops and Nils made it possible. We were not disappointed. Thanks again!

    Poured side by side in tasting glasses. Almost fresh to a little over 3 years old. All the vintages smell of coffee, so it would be incorrect to say that coffee fades completely. The intensity and the note itself varies from year to year (or age to age), but coffee is (still) going strong.

    We first sampled from oldest to youngest and coffee was apparent across the vertical. 2008 smelled of strong, cold espresso. 2009 had coffee notes but had something off in the aroma: smelled yucky and stale. 2010 was all coffee, typical of this beer but I preferred the 2008 in its aroma. 2011, especially after sampling the older ones came off way too strong, almost pungent!

    The taste was just fine across the vertical with the coffee (predictably) getting stronger. After giving the palates some time, we sampled the vertical in the opposite order (11 → 10 → 09 → 08) and the aging became very very apparent. The coffee seemed quite mute in 2008 and 09, and some moderately aged American Barleywine-esque notes came forward.

    Overall, the preference of the group seemed to be 2010, which indicates that fresh Breakfast Stout might be too big of a coffee bomb.

Canadian Breakfast Stout (Review # 300)
    Sampled in tasting snifter side by side with KBS. Looks the part: dark brown, medium head, medium retention. Typical.

    Smells delicious! Maple (especially strong when sampled with KBS on the side), chocolate, and the aroma of coffee beans being ground. Masterful!

    Tastes acidic and sweet, with pronounced notes of coffee and bourbon. The maple is not strong in the flavor. Very velvety and delightfully sticky, but could have been thicker. There is some vanilla but the vanilla is way stronger in KBS.

    As remarked, I could use some more maple but this is one monster of a beer and any flavor will have a hard time standing up to the strong coffee and bourbon. An excellent beer, worth the effort spent in acquiring it. That said, if I had to choose, I will take KBS.

4.5, 4.5, 4.5, 4.5, 4.5

Hanssens Gueuze
    Poured into a tasting snifter. Used to break the barrel aged monotony (!) after drinking CBS/KBS and before drinking Old Rasputin XII.

    Milky amber without any significant head. Smells pungent, mustard and spice, hay, grass, and lemon at the back. Really lemony in taste, and yet I couldn't help but notice hints of vinegar. Quite tart and sharp in its taste, but mouthfeel seemed lacking: heavier bodied and almost creamy at times, even in presence of ample carbonation.

    Overall it seemed to lack complexity and got lost in one dimensional tartness, not to mention the vinegar. Frankly, I liked Cuvee Rene better!

3.5, 4, 3, 3.5, 3

Old Rasputin XII
    Looks dead. Woody and bourbony aroma, with wood spoiling the mood. Disappointing aroma. The taste is quite acidic, with bourbon, oak and vanilla; and slight roast in the finish.

    Body is rather thin and therefore the beer seems overcarbonated even though there was no head whatsoever. Certainly not worth the 25 dollars a pint price it sells (or sold) for.

3, 2, 4, 3, 3